Peter Gallagher
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
-
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 19
- Nursing Roles and Practices 8
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 16
- Co-authors
- Karen Ousey (3 shared papers)Eileen McKinlay (16 shared papers)Sue Pullon (12 shared papers)Lesley Gray (7 shared papers)Mark Huthwaite (4 shared papers)Bee Teng Lim (3 shared papers)Helen Moriarty (3 shared papers)Patrick McHugh (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Clinical Teacher (7 papers)Nurse Education Today (7 papers)Journal of Interprofessional Care (3 papers)Medical Teacher (2 papers)Nurse Education in Practice (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomQatar
In The Last Decade
Peter Gallagher
35 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Research and Theory 79
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 28
- Family Practice 44
- General Health Professions 286
- Leadership and Management 13
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gallagher
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gallagher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gallagher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gallagher. The network helps show where Peter Gallagher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gallagher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 9 |
About Peter Gallagher
Peter Gallagher is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Research and Theory and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 38 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (19 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (8 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers), Film in Education and Therapy (4 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (79 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (28 citations), Family Practice (44 citations), General Health Professions (286 citations) and Leadership and Management (13 citations). Peter Gallagher has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Karen Ousey, Eileen McKinlay, Sue Pullon, Lesley Gray, Mark Huthwaite, Bee Teng Lim, Helen Moriarty, Patrick McHugh, Ben Darlow and Meredith Perry. Their work appears in journals such as The Clinical Teacher, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Medical Teacher and Nurse Education in Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.