Peter Gallagher

740 total citations
38 papers, 546 citations indexed

About

Peter Gallagher is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Gallagher has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 546 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in General Health Professions, 18 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Peter Gallagher's work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (19 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (8 papers). Peter Gallagher is often cited by papers focused on Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (19 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (8 papers). Peter Gallagher collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Qatar. Peter Gallagher's co-authors include Karen Ousey, Eileen McKinlay, Sue Pullon, Lesley Gray, Mark Huthwaite, Bee Teng Lim, Helen Moriarty, Patrick McHugh, Ben Darlow and Christine Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Medical Teacher and Nurse Education Today.

In The Last Decade

Peter Gallagher

35 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Gallagher New Zealand 14 286 273 142 88 79 38 546
Jill Konkin Canada 13 307 1.1× 455 1.7× 84 0.6× 76 0.9× 33 0.4× 37 644
Lorraine Ellis United Kingdom 13 352 1.2× 216 0.8× 93 0.7× 41 0.5× 83 1.1× 21 522
Carol Norton Australia 8 150 0.5× 199 0.7× 156 1.1× 45 0.5× 64 0.8× 10 602
Mohamed Al‐Eraky Saudi Arabia 14 157 0.5× 364 1.3× 95 0.7× 92 1.0× 11 0.1× 35 513
Arja Suikkala Finland 14 327 1.1× 198 0.7× 81 0.6× 58 0.7× 176 2.2× 22 565
Anne Fahy Ireland 10 157 0.5× 133 0.5× 77 0.5× 22 0.3× 100 1.3× 17 346
Eileen Egan‐Lee Canada 9 500 1.7× 474 1.7× 109 0.8× 35 0.4× 14 0.2× 12 740
Lorretta Krautscheid United States 11 221 0.8× 154 0.6× 73 0.5× 21 0.2× 97 1.2× 19 478
Charlotte Rothwell United Kingdom 10 214 0.7× 270 1.0× 42 0.3× 26 0.3× 16 0.2× 24 498
Colleen Ryan Australia 14 246 0.9× 151 0.6× 93 0.7× 27 0.3× 186 2.4× 55 570

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gallagher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gallagher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gallagher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gallagher. The network helps show where Peter Gallagher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Gallagher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Gallagher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Gallagher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Gallagher. Peter Gallagher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gallagher, Peter, et al.. (2017). Radiation therapy students’ perceptions of a wiki. The Clinical Teacher. 15(5). 413–418. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pullon, Susan, Christine Wilson, Peter Gallagher, et al.. (2016). Transition to practice: can rural interprofessional education make a difference? A cohort study. BMC Medical Education. 16(1). 154–154. 34 indexed citations
3.
Gallagher, Peter, et al.. (2016). Interprofessional undergraduate students talk about nurses and nursing: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today. 39. 7–11. 10 indexed citations
4.
Darlow, Ben, Karen J. Coleman, Eileen McKinlay, et al.. (2016). What makes an interprofessional education programme meaningful to students? Findings from focus group interviews with students based in New Zealand. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 30(3). 355–361. 18 indexed citations
5.
Lim, Bee Teng, et al.. (2016). Teaching empathy to undergraduate medical students: Translation to practice. Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal. 17(1). 59–59. 7 indexed citations
6.
Gallagher, Peter, Sue Pullon, Margot Skinner, et al.. (2015). An interprofessional community education project as a socially accountable assessment. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 29(5). 509–511. 9 indexed citations
7.
Perry, Meredith, Ben Darlow, Eileen McKinlay, et al.. (2015). “We’re here for the patient at the end of the day”: perceptions of an IPE programme in long-term conditions management. Physiotherapy. 101. e1195–e1196. 2 indexed citations
8.
Barthow, Christine, et al.. (2014). Researching in the community: the value and contribution of nurses to community based or primary health care research. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 16(3). 224–234. 9 indexed citations
9.
Gallagher, Peter, et al.. (2012). Developing the One‐Minute Preceptor. The Clinical Teacher. 9(6). 358–362. 24 indexed citations
10.
Gallagher, Peter, Trish Smith, & Karen Ousey. (2012). Problems with competence assessment as it applies to student nurses. Nurse Education in Practice. 12(6). 301–303. 14 indexed citations
11.
Lim, Bee Teng, Helen Moriarty, Mark Huthwaite, et al.. (2012). How well do medical students rate and communicate clinical empathy?. Medical Teacher. 35(2). e946–e951. 51 indexed citations
12.
Gallagher, Peter, et al.. (2011). A pilot study of medical student attitudes to, and use of, commercial movies that address public health issues. BMC Research Notes. 4(1). 111–111. 12 indexed citations
13.
Gallagher, Peter & Sue Pullon. (2011). Travelling educational workshops for clinical teachers: are they worthwhile?. The Clinical Teacher. 8(1). 52–56. 5 indexed citations
14.
Ousey, Karen & Peter Gallagher. (2010). The clinical credibility of nurse educators: Time the debate was put to rest. Nurse Education Today. 30(7). 662–665. 26 indexed citations
15.
Gallagher, Peter. (2010). The role of the assessor in the assessment of practice: An alternative view. Medical Teacher. 32(10). e413–e416. 12 indexed citations
16.
Gallagher, Peter, et al.. (2009). The impact of a change to assessment policy on students from a New Zealand School of Nursing. Nurse Education Today. 29(7). 722–730. 3 indexed citations
17.
Gallagher, Peter. (2007). Preconceptions and learning to be a nurse. Nurse Education Today. 27(8). 878–884. 21 indexed citations
18.
Ousey, Karen & Peter Gallagher. (2007). The theory–practice relationship in nursing: A debate. Nurse Education in Practice. 7(4). 199–205. 34 indexed citations
19.
Gallagher, Peter. (2004). How the metaphor of a gap between theory and practice has influenced nursing education. Nurse Education Today. 24(4). 263–268. 63 indexed citations
20.
Gallagher, Peter. (2001). An evaluation of a standards based portfolio. Nurse Education Today. 21(3). 197–200. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026