Nurse Education in Practice

2.8k papers and 51.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Nurse Education in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 51.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Nurse Education in Practice usually cover General Health Professions (1.1k papers), Education (774 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (770 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing education and management (732 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (591 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (478 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nurse Education in Practice are Fiona Timmins, Alison M. Smith, Patricia Cronin, Tracy Levett‐Jones, Anita Duffy, Judith Lathlean, Lisa McKenna, Kathie Lasater, Debbie Roberts and Amanda Henderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nurse Education in Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nurse Education in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nurse Education in Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Nurse Education in Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nurse Education in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nurse Education in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nurse Education in Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025