Journal of Interprofessional Care

2.6k papers and 51.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Journal of Interprofessional Care in the last decades have received a total of 51.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Interprofessional Care usually cover General Health Professions (2.2k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (990 papers) and Education (310 papers) specifically the topics of Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1.9k papers), Innovations in Medical Education (606 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (337 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Interprofessional Care are Scott Reeves, Pippa Hall, Danielle D’Amour, Ivy Oandasan, Hugh Barr, Phillip G. Clark, Marie‐Dominique Beaulieu, John Gilbert, Bob Hudson and Della Freeth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Interprofessional Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Interprofessional Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Interprofessional Care.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Interprofessional Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Interprofessional Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Interprofessional Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Interprofessional Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025