The Clinical Teacher

1.6k papers and 13.0k indexed citations

About

The 1.6k papers published in The Clinical Teacher in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Clinical Teacher usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k papers), General Health Professions (573 papers) and Family Practice (356 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (1.0k papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (355 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (253 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Clinical Teacher are Annette Burgess, Anu Kajamaa, Craig Mellis, Judy McKimm, David Boud, Tim Swanwick, Robert Perry, Carol A. Bernstein, Waguih William IsHak and Dotun Ogunyemi.

In The Last Decade

The Clinical Teacher

1.4k papers receiving 12.4k citations

Countries where authors publish in The Clinical Teacher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Clinical Teacher. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Clinical Teacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Clinical Teacher more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Clinical Teacher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Clinical Teacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Clinical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026