Paul Orsmond
- Education top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen MerryKevin ReilingLinda Hammersley‐FletcherAnne C. CrookStephen J MawStephen GomezJulian R. ParkJulian Park
- Topics
- Student Assessment and Feedback (18 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (16 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (13 papers)
- Journals
- Computers & EducationStudies in Higher EducationAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Paul Orsmond
29 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Education 1.8k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 348
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 166
- Information Systems 143
- Language and Linguistics 139
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Orsmond
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Orsmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Orsmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Orsmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Orsmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Orsmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Orsmond. The network helps show where Paul Orsmond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Orsmond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Orsmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Orsmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Orsmond. Paul Orsmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Biology students' perceptions of learning from video exemplars of practical techniques: some lessons for teaching strategies | 5 |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 134 | |
| 9 | 102 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 181 | |
| 12 | ASSET: moving forward through feedback | 6 |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 177 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 80 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 119 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 237 |
About Paul Orsmond
Paul Orsmond is a scholar working on Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 30 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Student Assessment and Feedback (18 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (16 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (1.8k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (348 citations) and Computer Science Applications (101 citations). Paul Orsmond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Merry, Kevin Reiling, Linda Hammersley‐Fletcher, Anne C. Crook, Stephen J Maw, Stephen Gomez, Julian R. Park, Julian Park, Clare Lawson and Karsten Lundqvist. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Studies in Higher Education and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.