Jane Sampson

2.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
12 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Jane Sampson is a scholar working on Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Sampson has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 2 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics and 2 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane Sampson's work include Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). Jane Sampson is often cited by papers focused on Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). Jane Sampson collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Jane Sampson's co-authors include David Boud, Ruth Cohen, Geoff Anderson and Lois Meyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Studies in Continuing Education and Figshare.

In The Last Decade

Jane Sampson

10 papers receiving 991 citations

Hit Papers

Peer Learning and Assessment 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 2014 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Sampson Australia 6 831 266 148 118 104 12 1.1k
Berry O’Donovan United Kingdom 13 1.8k 2.1× 286 1.1× 159 1.1× 123 1.0× 92 0.9× 16 2.0k
Colleen Mills Australia 6 697 0.8× 366 1.4× 107 0.7× 88 0.7× 86 0.8× 8 1.1k
Michele Jacobsen Canada 17 714 0.9× 171 0.6× 78 0.5× 125 1.1× 170 1.6× 102 1.2k
Marlies Baeten Belgium 13 1.1k 1.3× 272 1.0× 99 0.7× 108 0.9× 103 1.0× 22 1.4k
Sarah Gielen Belgium 17 1.2k 1.4× 359 1.3× 68 0.5× 97 0.8× 101 1.0× 38 1.4k
Robert A. Ellis Australia 20 1.1k 1.3× 339 1.3× 79 0.5× 245 2.1× 158 1.5× 32 1.4k
Paul Orsmond United Kingdom 15 1.8k 2.1× 348 1.3× 166 1.1× 101 0.9× 143 1.4× 30 2.0k
Beau Fly Jones United States 13 634 0.8× 363 1.4× 63 0.4× 84 0.7× 101 1.0× 38 1.1k
Elizabeth F. Barkley 5 831 1.0× 328 1.2× 42 0.3× 125 1.1× 141 1.4× 5 1.2k
Donald Bligh United Kingdom 9 801 1.0× 211 0.8× 123 0.8× 84 0.7× 71 0.7× 23 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Sampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Sampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Sampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Sampson. The network helps show where Jane Sampson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Sampson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Sampson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Sampson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Sampson. Jane Sampson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Boud, David, et al.. (2014). Peer learning and assessment. 67–81. 1 indexed citations
2.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Peer learning in law: using a group journal. 123–135.
3.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Introduction: Making the move to peer learning. 9–26. 88 indexed citations
4.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Strategies for peer learning: some examples. 43–57. 1 indexed citations
5.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Peer learning using computer supported roleplay-simulations. 149–163. 3 indexed citations
6.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Implementing and managing peer learning. 58–74. 1 indexed citations
7.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Peer Learning in Higher Education : Learning from and with Each Other. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 314 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Anderson, Geoff, David Boud, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Learning Contracts: A Practical Guide. Figshare. 10 indexed citations
9.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (2014). Aligning peer assessment with peer learning for large classes: the case for an online self and peer assessment system. 164–177. 12 indexed citations
10.
Meyer, Lois, et al.. (2007). Enhancing learning in the academic workplace through reflective team teaching. 4(3). 237–247. 2 indexed citations
11.
Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, & Jane Sampson. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 24(4). 413–426. 695 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Sampson, Jane, et al.. (1995). Reflection in the context of team‐teaching. Studies in Continuing Education. 17(1-2). 58–69. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026