Olı́via Pinho
- Food Science top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Co-authors
- Isabel M.P.L.V.O. FerreiraOlga ViegasElsa F. VieiraZita E. MartinsArmindo MeloCatarina PetiscaEdgar PintoJoão Costa‐Rodrigues
- Topics
- Nutritional Studies and Diet (28 papers)Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (26 papers)Sodium Intake and Health (20 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnalytical ChemistryJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Partner nations
- PortugalMozambiqueDenmark
In The Last Decade
Olı́via Pinho
120 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Food Science 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 870
- Nutrition and Dietetics 770
- Animal Science and Zoology 735
- Biomedical Engineering 526
Countries citing papers authored by Olı́via Pinho
This map shows the geographic impact of Olı́via Pinho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olı́via Pinho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olı́via Pinho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Olı́via Pinho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olı́via Pinho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olı́via Pinho. The network helps show where Olı́via Pinho may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olı́via Pinho
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olı́via Pinho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olı́via Pinho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olı́via Pinho. Olı́via Pinho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Pilot Study to Reduce Added Salt on a University Canteen through the Use of an Innovative Dosage Equipment | 4 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | Importancia del pan blanco como fuente de nutrientes: reducción de sodio y fortificación con calcio | 1 |
| 16 | 151 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | Volatile profile and sensory characteristics of creams used as fillers of bakery products: home made egg creams vs industrial creams | 3 |
| 20 | 10 |
About Olı́via Pinho
Olı́via Pinho is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Biochemistry, having authored 123 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (28 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (26 papers) and Sodium Intake and Health (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.7k citations), Biochemistry (475 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (735 citations). Olı́via Pinho has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Mozambique and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Isabel M.P.L.V.O. Ferreira, Olga Viegas, Elsa F. Vieira, Zita E. Martins, Armindo Melo, Catarina Petisca, Edgar Pinto, João Costa‐Rodrigues, Pedro Monteiro and Catarina Mansilha. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Analytical Chemistry and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.