Nick J. Broers
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wim JochemsRob MartensJan-Willem StrijbosSaskia Brand‐GruwelTjaart ImbosMartijn P. F. BergerJeroen J. G. van MerriënboerCees van der Vleuten
- Topics
- Statistics Education and Methodologies (12 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nick J. Broers
59 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Education 452
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 406
- Clinical Psychology 394
- Social Psychology 209
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 176
Countries citing papers authored by Nick J. Broers
This map shows the geographic impact of Nick J. Broers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick J. Broers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick J. Broers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nick J. Broers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick J. Broers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick J. Broers. The network helps show where Nick J. Broers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick J. Broers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick J. Broers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick J. Broers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick J. Broers. Nick J. Broers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 160 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | The reliability of identification evidence with multiple lineups | 7 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Nick J. Broers
Nick J. Broers is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistics Education and Methodologies (12 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (406 citations), Family Practice (52 citations) and Communication (131 citations). Nick J. Broers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wim Jochems, Rob Martens, Jan-Willem Strijbos, Saskia Brand‐Gruwel, Tjaart Imbos, Martijn P. F. Berger, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, Cees van der Vleuten, Kim van Oorsouw and Jimmie Leppink. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.