Steve D. Charman

967 total citations
29 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Steve D. Charman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve D. Charman has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Steve D. Charman's work include Memory Processes and Influences (21 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers). Steve D. Charman is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (21 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers). Steve D. Charman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Steve D. Charman's co-authors include Gary L. Wells, Elizabeth A. Olson, Rolando N. Carol, Marianna Carlucci, Brian S. Cahill, Daniella K. Villalba, Amy Bradfield Douglass, Annelies Vredeveldt, James D. Sauer and Melanie Sauerland and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Current Directions in Psychological Science and Applied Cognitive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Steve D. Charman

29 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steve D. Charman United States 13 357 301 66 59 58 29 449
Don Read United Kingdom 2 346 1.0× 258 0.9× 38 0.6× 49 0.8× 89 1.5× 2 406
Charles A. Goodsell United States 11 326 0.9× 274 0.9× 47 0.7× 40 0.7× 99 1.7× 17 390
Stacy A. Wetmore United States 10 278 0.8× 250 0.8× 75 1.1× 64 1.1× 78 1.3× 32 382
Dawn McQuiston‐Surrett United States 9 289 0.8× 186 0.6× 54 0.8× 33 0.6× 42 0.7× 13 421
Rod C. L. Lindsay Canada 10 301 0.8× 257 0.9× 33 0.5× 43 0.7× 75 1.3× 19 406
Ryan J. Fitzgerald Canada 10 276 0.8× 197 0.7× 27 0.4× 21 0.4× 47 0.8× 35 342
Curt A. Carlson United States 15 624 1.7× 397 1.3× 30 0.5× 43 0.7× 147 2.5× 38 734
Jennifer L Beaudry Australia 9 132 0.4× 109 0.4× 17 0.3× 29 0.5× 28 0.5× 27 224
Amy‐May Leach Canada 11 131 0.4× 228 0.8× 15 0.2× 112 1.9× 17 0.3× 22 319
Lauren M. Knott United Kingdom 12 372 1.0× 196 0.7× 9 0.1× 34 0.6× 7 0.1× 26 436

Countries citing papers authored by Steve D. Charman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve D. Charman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve D. Charman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve D. Charman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve D. Charman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve D. Charman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve D. Charman. The network helps show where Steve D. Charman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve D. Charman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve D. Charman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve D. Charman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve D. Charman. Steve D. Charman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2022). Assessing the effect of eyewitness identification confidence assessment method on the confidence-accuracy relationship.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 28(3). 414–432. 7 indexed citations
2.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2022). The ability to infer witness accuracy from high-confidence lineup identifications is undermined by the appearance-change instruction and target appearance change.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 28(4). 491–504. 2 indexed citations
3.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2021). Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.. Law and Human Behavior. 45(6). 524–541. 2 indexed citations
4.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2020). Enhancing innocent suspects’ memories for corroborating alibi evidence.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 26(4). 442–454. 2 indexed citations
5.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2019). Non‐blind lineup administration biases administrators' interpretations of ambiguous witness statements and their perceptions of the witness. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33(6). 1260–1270. 2 indexed citations
6.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2019). Cognitive bias in legal decision making.. 9 indexed citations
7.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2018). The effect of biased lineup instructions on eyewitness identification confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 32(3). 287–297. 4 indexed citations
8.
Sauerland, Melanie, et al.. (2018). Showup identification decisions for multiple perpetrator crimes: Testing for sequential dependencies. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0208403–e0208403. 10 indexed citations
9.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2016). The (Un)reliability of Alibi Corroborators: Failure to Recognize Faces of Briefly Encountered Strangers Puts Innocent Suspects at Risk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 35(1). 18–36. 2 indexed citations
10.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2016). Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications.. Law and Human Behavior. 40(5). 477–487. 18 indexed citations
11.
Charman, Steve D. & Rolando N. Carol. (2012). Age-progressed images may harm recognition of missing children by increasing the number of plausible targets.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 1(3). 171–178. 3 indexed citations
12.
Charman, Steve D. & Brian S. Cahill. (2011). Witnesses’ memories for lineup fillers postdicts their identification accuracy.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 1(1). 11–17. 9 indexed citations
13.
Charman, Steve D. & Gary L. Wells. (2011). The Moderating Effect of Ecphoric Experience on Post‐identification Feedback: A Critical Test of the Cues‐based Inference Conceptualization. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 26(2). 243–250. 15 indexed citations
14.
Olson, Elizabeth A. & Steve D. Charman. (2011). ‘But can you prove it?’ – examining the quality of innocent suspects' alibis. Psychology Crime and Law. 18(5). 453–471. 45 indexed citations
15.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2010). The selective cue integration framework: A theory of postidentification witness confidence assessment.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 16(2). 204–218. 25 indexed citations
16.
Charman, Steve D. & Gary L. Wells. (2008). Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 14(1). 5–20. 14 indexed citations
17.
Charman, Steve D. & Gary L. Wells. (2006). Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea?. Law and Human Behavior. 31(1). 3–22. 30 indexed citations
18.
Charman, Steve D. & Gary L. Wells. (2006). Applied Lineup Theory. 25 indexed citations
19.
Wells, Gary L., Steve D. Charman, & Elizabeth A. Olson. (2005). Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 11(3). 147–156. 35 indexed citations
20.
Wells, Gary L., Elizabeth A. Olson, & Steve D. Charman. (2003). Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 9(1). 42–52. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Don Read Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles A. Goodsell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stacy A. Wetmore Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dawn McQuiston‐Surrett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rod C. L. Lindsay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ryan J. Fitzgerald Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Curt A. Carlson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer L Beaudry Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy‐May Leach Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lauren M. Knott
Rankless by CCL
2026