Luc Budé

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 841 citations indexed

About

Luc Budé is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Luc Budé has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 841 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Luc Budé's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers). Luc Budé is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers). Luc Budé collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Norway. Luc Budé's co-authors include Marianne Nieuwenhuijze, Daniel Kotz, Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Luc Smits, Mark Spigt, Jan Serroyen, Rik Crutzen, Raymond De Vries, Tjaart Imbos and Martijn P. F. Berger and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Health Services Research and Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Luc Budé

26 papers receiving 792 citations

Hit Papers

A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pi... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luc Budé Netherlands 13 243 234 152 121 108 26 841
Rafael Jiménez Spain 15 68 0.3× 89 0.4× 167 1.1× 43 0.4× 138 1.3× 58 894
Linda Yin King Lee Hong Kong 17 99 0.4× 194 0.8× 103 0.7× 78 0.6× 188 1.7× 64 1.0k
Megan Nuspl Canada 12 214 0.9× 357 1.5× 90 0.6× 21 0.2× 205 1.9× 19 1.1k
Helen West United Kingdom 15 377 1.6× 233 1.0× 304 2.0× 15 0.1× 106 1.0× 40 903
Kim Watts United Kingdom 14 143 0.6× 290 1.2× 112 0.7× 57 0.5× 365 3.4× 31 996
Lisa Dyson United Kingdom 18 63 0.3× 262 1.1× 212 1.4× 46 0.4× 272 2.5× 33 1.1k
Clément Dassa Canada 20 204 0.8× 206 0.9× 253 1.7× 36 0.3× 228 2.1× 36 1.3k
Jonas Minet Kinge Norway 19 89 0.4× 235 1.0× 93 0.6× 16 0.1× 310 2.9× 48 1.1k
Cauane Blumenberg Brazil 18 69 0.3× 191 0.8× 202 1.3× 26 0.2× 224 2.1× 86 883
Jürgen Breckenkamp Germany 16 122 0.5× 116 0.5× 175 1.2× 12 0.1× 196 1.8× 85 834

Countries citing papers authored by Luc Budé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Budé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Budé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Budé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Budé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Budé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Budé. The network helps show where Luc Budé may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc Budé

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc Budé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc Budé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luc Budé. Luc Budé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Keulen, Judit K. J., et al.. (2024). Development of the Conversational Health Literacy Assessment Tool for maternity care (CHAT-maternity-care): participatory action research. BMC Health Services Research. 24(1). 135–135. 1 indexed citations
2.
Budé, Luc, et al.. (2023). Women's Birth Beliefs During Pregnancy and Postpartum in the Netherlands: A Quantitative Cross‐Sectional Study. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 68(2). 210–220. 5 indexed citations
3.
Budé, Luc, et al.. (2022). Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 22(1). 109–109. 47 indexed citations
4.
Budé, Luc, et al.. (2022). Women's decision‐making autonomy in Dutch maternity care. Birth. 50(2). 384–395. 9 indexed citations
5.
Low, Lisa Kane, et al.. (2020). Evaluating the effect of an educational intervention on student midwife self-efficacy for their role as physiological childbirth advocates. Nurse Education Today. 96. 104628–104628. 6 indexed citations
6.
Wassen, Martine, et al.. (2018). Effect of the use of a national information brochure about fetal movements on patient delay. Women and Birth. 32(2). 131–136. 7 indexed citations
7.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne, et al.. (2018). Creating an Optimality Index – Netherlands: a validation study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18(1). 100–100. 8 indexed citations
8.
Ausems, Marlein, et al.. (2017). Factors affecting perceived change in physical activity in pregnancy. Midwifery. 51. 16–23. 18 indexed citations
9.
Ausems, Marlein, et al.. (2015). Weight gain in healthy pregnant women in relation to pre-pregnancy BMI, diet and physical activity. Midwifery. 31(7). 693–701. 36 indexed citations
10.
Kuipers, Yvonne, et al.. (2015). Factors influencing maternal distress among Dutch women with a healthy pregnancy. Women and Birth. 28(3). e36–e43. 45 indexed citations
12.
Kuipers, Yvonne, Luc Budé, Marlein Ausems, Raymond De Vries, & Marianne Nieuwenhuijze. (2013). Dutch midwives' behavioural intentions of antenatal management of maternal distress and factors influencing these intentions: An exploratory survey. Midwifery. 30(2). 234–241. 21 indexed citations
13.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne, Ank de Jonge, Irene Korstjens, Luc Budé, & Toine Lagro‐Janssen. (2013). Influence on birthing positions affects women's sense of control in second stage of labour. Midwifery. 29(11). e107–e114. 44 indexed citations
14.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne, et al.. (2012). Preferred place of birth: Characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 28(5). 609–618. 34 indexed citations
15.
Wijnen, H., et al.. (2012). Patterns of gestational weight gain in healthy, low-risk pregnant women without co-morbidities. Midwifery. 29(5). 535–541. 19 indexed citations
16.
Budé, Luc, Margaretha W. J. van de Wiel, Tjaart Imbos, & Martijn P. F. Berger. (2011). The effect of guiding questions on students’ performance and attitude towards statistics. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(2). 340–359. 7 indexed citations
17.
Budé, Luc, Margaretha W. J. van de Wiel, Tjaart Imbos, & Martijn P. F. Berger. (2010). The effect of directive tutor guidance on students' conceptual understanding of statistics in problem‐based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(2). 309–324. 24 indexed citations
18.
Budé, Luc, et al.. (2008). The effect of directive tutor guidance in problem-based learning of statistics on students’ perceptions and achievement. Higher Education. 57(1). 23–36. 33 indexed citations
19.
Budé, Luc, Margaretha W. J. van de Wiel, Tjaart Imbos, et al.. (2007). STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENTS IN A STATISTICS COURSE IN RELATION TO MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS AND STUDY BEHAVIOUR. Statistics Education Research Journal. 6(1). 5–21. 33 indexed citations
20.
Broers, Nick J., Marieke Mur, & Luc Budé. (2004). Directed Self-Explanation in the Study of Statistics. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026