Lorraine Hope

3.7k total citations
132 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Lorraine Hope is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lorraine Hope has authored 132 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 91 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 89 papers in Social Psychology and 24 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lorraine Hope's work include Memory Processes and Influences (81 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (77 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (19 papers). Lorraine Hope is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (81 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (77 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (19 papers). Lorraine Hope collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Lorraine Hope's co-authors include Fiona Gabbert, Ronald P. Fisher, Aldert Vrij, Amina Memon, Kathryn Mearns, Ray Bull, Samantha Mann, James Ost, Daniel B. Wright and Michael T. Ford and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Lorraine Hope

128 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lorraine Hope United Kingdom 26 1.3k 1.3k 550 489 249 132 2.3k
Fiona Gabbert United Kingdom 25 1.2k 0.9× 1.5k 1.2× 443 0.8× 194 0.4× 289 1.2× 79 2.0k
J. Don Read Canada 27 1.2k 0.9× 2.1k 1.6× 353 0.6× 429 0.9× 427 1.7× 72 2.8k
Brian L. Cutler United States 31 1.8k 1.4× 1.9k 1.5× 609 1.1× 368 0.8× 277 1.1× 102 3.3k
Glenn S. Sanders United States 18 1.0k 0.8× 486 0.4× 911 1.7× 523 1.1× 234 0.9× 47 2.6k
Xuejun Bai China 23 322 0.2× 817 0.6× 400 0.7× 679 1.4× 570 2.3× 151 2.7k
Daniel M. Bernstein Canada 30 564 0.4× 1.2k 0.9× 406 0.7× 166 0.3× 364 1.5× 108 2.2k
Neil Dagnall United Kingdom 28 1.2k 0.9× 546 0.4× 582 1.1× 603 1.2× 362 1.5× 166 2.5k
Xuqun You China 23 1.2k 0.9× 230 0.2× 439 0.8× 733 1.5× 410 1.6× 78 2.4k
Solomon M. Fulero United States 18 1.1k 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 543 1.0× 257 0.5× 150 0.6× 37 2.0k
James M. Wood United States 31 698 0.5× 891 0.7× 360 0.7× 1.6k 3.2× 662 2.7× 82 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Lorraine Hope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorraine Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorraine Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorraine Hope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorraine Hope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorraine Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorraine Hope. The network helps show where Lorraine Hope may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lorraine Hope

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lorraine Hope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lorraine Hope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lorraine Hope. Lorraine Hope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Price, Heather L., Kirk Luther, Wayne B. Thomas, Fiona Gabbert, & Lorraine Hope. (2024). Extracting Witness Evidence in “Cold Case” Investigations: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 40(2). 405–416.
2.
Akehurst, Lucy, et al.. (2024). Who Said What? The Effects of Cognitive Load on Source Monitoring and Memory for Multiple witnesses' Accounts. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 38(6). e70011–e70011. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hope, Lorraine, et al.. (2023). Exploring cultural differences in eyewitness accounts using a self-administered reporting technique. Psychology Crime and Law. 32(1). 182–200. 5 indexed citations
4.
Rubínová, Eva, et al.. (2021). Facilitating recall and particularisation of repeated events in adults using a multi-method interviewing format. Memory. 29(4). 471–485. 9 indexed citations
5.
Sauerland, Melanie, et al.. (2021). The effects of acute stress on eyewitness memory: an integrative review for eyewitness researchers. Memory. 29(8). 1091–1100. 14 indexed citations
6.
Sauerland, Melanie, et al.. (2021). Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 3462–3462. 5 indexed citations
7.
Milne, Rebecca, et al.. (2020). ‘He was just your typical average guy’ Examining how person descriptions are elicited by frontline police officers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 35(2). 517–525. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hope, Lorraine, et al.. (2020). “Tell me more about this…”: An examination of the efficacy of follow‐up open questions following an initial account. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34(5). 972–983. 20 indexed citations
9.
Rubínová, Eva, et al.. (2020). Live presentation for eyewitness identification is not superior to photo or video presentation.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 10(1). 167–176. 10 indexed citations
10.
Blank, Hartmut, et al.. (2020). Do image variability and names in missing person appeals improve prospective person memory?. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 9(3). 410–418. 6 indexed citations
11.
Blank, Hartmut, et al.. (2020). Do Image Variability and Names in Missing Person Appeals Improve Prospective Person Memory?. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 9(3). 410–418. 4 indexed citations
12.
Otgaar, Henry, et al.. (2020). The effects of stress on eyewitness memory: A survey of memory experts and laypeople. Memory & Cognition. 49(3). 401–421. 18 indexed citations
13.
Vrij, Aldert, et al.. (2019). The devil is in the detail: deception and consistency over repeated interviews. Psychology Crime and Law. 25(7). 752–770. 5 indexed citations
14.
Hope, Lorraine, et al.. (2019). Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans.. Law and Human Behavior. 43(3). 263–277. 16 indexed citations
16.
Hope, Lorraine, et al.. (2018). The benefits of a self-generated cue mnemonic for timeline interviewing.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 7(3). 454–461. 3 indexed citations
17.
Bošković, Irena, et al.. (2018). The Modified Stroop Task Is Susceptible to Feigning: Stroop Performance and Symptom Over-endorsement in Feigned Test Anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1195–1195. 12 indexed citations
18.
Harvey, Adam Charles, Aldert Vrij, Lorraine Hope, Sharon Leal, & Samantha Mann. (2017). A stability bias effect among deceivers.. Law and Human Behavior. 41(6). 519–529. 14 indexed citations
19.
Gabbert, Fiona, Lorraine Hope, & Ronald P. Fisher. (2008). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool.. Law and Human Behavior. 33(4). 298–307. 139 indexed citations
20.
Hope, Lorraine, Amina Memon, & Peter McGeorge. (2004). Understanding Pretrial Publicity: Predecisional Distortion of Evidence by Mock Jurors.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 10(2). 111–119. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026