Anita Jansen

20.0k citations
321 papers · 14.6k · h-index 66

Impact in

Papers in

Anita Jansen

299 papers receiving 14.1k citations

Peers

Anita Jansen
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Applied Psychology 3.7k
  • Clinical Psychology 8.8k
  • Sensory Systems 1.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.6k
  • Pharmacy 871
Replace C. Peter Herman with:
C. Peter Herman Canada
Chantal Nederkoorn Netherlands
Peter Muris Netherlands
Barbara J. Rolls United States
Janet Treasure United Kingdom
W. Stewart Agras United States
Suzanne Higgs United Kingdom
Ulrike Schmidt United Kingdom
Brendan P. Bradley United Kingdom
Caroline Davis Canada
Anita Jansen relative to C. Peter Herman Canada C. Peter Herman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. Peter Herman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anita Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anita Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anita Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anita Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anita Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anita Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anita Jansen. The network helps show where Anita Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anita Jansen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anita Jansen Line = papers co-authored together Anita Jansen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 321 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005409
2 2010314
3 2008289
4 1998281
5 2006280
6 2011274
7 2011270
8 2010266
9 2003252
10 2006238
11 2015221
12 2011217
13 2004211
14 2000210
15 2007186
16 2011186
17 2012178
18 2006177
19 2007167
20 2000161

About Anita Jansen

Anita Jansen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Food Science, having authored 321 papers that have together received 14.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (195 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (85 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (83 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (41 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (37 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (31 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (26 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (3.7k citations), Clinical Psychology (8.8k citations), Sensory Systems (1.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.6k citations) and Pharmacy (871 citations). Anita Jansen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chantal Nederkoorn, Anne Roefs, Katrijn Houben, Remco C. Havermans, Sandra Mulkens, Ramona Guerrieri, Reínout W. Wiers, Fren T.Y. Smulders, Carolien Martijn and Peggy Bongers. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Eating Behaviors, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact