Countries citing papers authored by R. Eric Landrum
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Eric Landrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Eric Landrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Eric Landrum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Eric Landrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Eric Landrum. The network helps show where R. Eric Landrum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Eric Landrum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Eric Landrum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Eric Landrum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Eric Landrum. R. Eric Landrum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Landrum, R. Eric, et al.. (2018). Civility and Academic Freedom: Who Defines the Former (and How) May Imperil Rights to the Latter.. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 21(1).1 indexed citations
3.
Shadle, Susan E., Ross Perkins, Doug Lincoln, Michael Humphrey, & R. Eric Landrum. (2013). A Multi-faceted, Organic Approach to a Campus-wide Mobile Learning Initiative: The Case of Boise State University. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2013(1). 665–672.2 indexed citations
4.
Gurung, Regan A. R. & R. Eric Landrum. (2012). Comparing Student Perceptions of Textbooks: Does Liking Influence Learning?. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 24(2). 144–150.9 indexed citations
Landrum, R. Eric. (2010). Intent to Apply to Graduate School: Perceptions of Senior Year Psychology Majors. North American journal of psychology. 12(2). 243.8 indexed citations
7.
Landrum, R. Eric. (2010). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Providing Instructor Lecture Notes to Students: Match or Mismatch?. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 37(3). 216–221.11 indexed citations
8.
Landrum, R. Eric, et al.. (2009). The Post-Baccalaureate Perceptions of Psychology Alumni. College student journal. 43(2). 676–681.4 indexed citations
9.
Landrum, R. Eric, et al.. (2008). Use of Alumni Perceptions to Evaluate Instructional and Departmental Quality. College student journal. 42(2). 408–415.3 indexed citations
10.
Landrum, R. Eric, et al.. (2006). Student Perceptions of Textbook Outlines.. College student journal. 40(3). 646–650.2 indexed citations
Landrum, R. Eric, et al.. (2000). Student Perceptions of Grading Practices: Does “Average” Class Performance Equal a “C” Grade?. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 34(1). 86–92.2 indexed citations
15.
Landrum, R. Eric. (1999). Student Expectations of Grade Inflation. Journal of research and development in education. 32(2). 124–128.32 indexed citations
16.
Landrum, R. Eric & Garvin Chastain. (1998). Demonstrating Tutoring Effectiveness within a One-semester Course. Journal of college student development. 39(5).1 indexed citations
Landrum, R. Eric, et al.. (1994). The Decision-Making Processes of Graduate Admissions Committees in Psychology. Journal of social behavior and personality.28 indexed citations
Landrum, R. Eric, Charles J. Meliska, & Wing Hong Loke. (1988). Effects of Caffeine and Task Experience on Task Performance. Psychologica. 31(2). 91–97.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.