Natalie Romer

461 total citations
11 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Natalie Romer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Romer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Education and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalie Romer's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers). Natalie Romer is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers). Natalie Romer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Natalie Romer's co-authors include Robert H. Horner, Scott W. Ross, Kenneth W. Merrell, Richard W. Albin, M. Kathleen Strickland–Cohen, Rhonda N. T. Nese, Joshua C. Felver, Amy L. Green, Keith D. Allen and Rachel J. Valleley and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychology in the Schools, Remedial and Special Education and Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Romer

10 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Romer United States 7 166 123 123 83 63 11 306
Robert G. Oats United States 10 124 0.7× 139 1.1× 141 1.1× 39 0.5× 39 0.6× 13 325
Mari‐Anne Sørlie Norway 11 213 1.3× 185 1.5× 172 1.4× 87 1.0× 40 0.6× 26 378
Aria E. Fiat United States 9 161 1.0× 215 1.7× 140 1.1× 117 1.4× 28 0.4× 15 400
Irvine Gersch United Kingdom 10 174 1.0× 187 1.5× 134 1.1× 69 0.8× 46 0.7× 39 345
Billie Jo Rodriguez United States 11 130 0.8× 103 0.8× 237 1.9× 43 0.5× 117 1.9× 17 330
James L. McDougal United States 10 212 1.3× 99 0.8× 254 2.1× 99 1.2× 80 1.3× 19 408
Ellie Kazemi United States 10 122 0.7× 65 0.5× 186 1.5× 51 0.6× 146 2.3× 31 345
Ronald K. Bramlett United States 12 245 1.5× 173 1.4× 249 2.0× 91 1.1× 62 1.0× 23 443
Michelle Marchant United States 12 151 0.9× 155 1.3× 216 1.8× 61 0.7× 111 1.8× 20 354
Kristin M. Rispoli United States 10 203 1.2× 172 1.4× 51 0.4× 39 0.5× 55 0.9× 33 307

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Romer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Romer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Romer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Romer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Romer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Romer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Romer. The network helps show where Natalie Romer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Romer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Romer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Romer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Romer. Natalie Romer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Romer, Natalie, et al.. (2020). To Create Safe and Healthy Schools during a Pandemic, Prioritize Educator Wellbeing.. 4 indexed citations
2.
Romer, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Mindfulness-Based Practices for Schools.. 1 indexed citations
4.
Felver, Joshua C., et al.. (2017). Effectiveness and Social Validity of the Soles of the Feet Mindfulness-Based Intervention with Special Education Students. Contemporary School Psychology. 21(4). 358–368. 18 indexed citations
5.
Mathews, Therese L., et al.. (2017). Expanding Access to Clinical Services for Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 32(2). 173–183. 4 indexed citations
6.
Valleley, Rachel J., et al.. (2014). Behavioral Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 6(3). 199–204. 5 indexed citations
7.
Strickland–Cohen, M. Kathleen, et al.. (2013). An Examination of Social Validity Within Single-Case Research With Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Remedial and Special Education. 34(6). 357–370. 33 indexed citations
8.
Nese, Rhonda N. T., et al.. (2012). Social emotional assets and resilience scales: development of a strength-based short-form behavior rating scale system. peDOCS. 4(1). 124–139. 24 indexed citations
9.
Romer, Natalie & Kenneth W. Merrell. (2012). Temporal Stability of Strength-Based Assessments. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 38(3). 185–191. 8 indexed citations
10.
Romer, Natalie, et al.. (2011). Gender differences in positive social–emotional functioning. Psychology in the Schools. 48(10). 958–970. 55 indexed citations
11.
Ross, Scott W., Natalie Romer, & Robert H. Horner. (2011). Teacher Well-Being and the Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 14(2). 118–128. 148 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026