Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by N. Craig Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Craig Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Craig Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Craig Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Craig Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Craig Smith. The network helps show where N. Craig Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Craig Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Craig Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Craig Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N. Craig Smith. N. Craig Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carnevale, Anthony P. & N. Craig Smith. (2013). In Demand: Community Colleges Already Train More than Half the Nation's Health Care Workforce--and Demand for Their Services Is on the Rise.. Community college journal. 84(2). 20–26.
10.
Simpson, Sally S., William S. Laufer, N. Craig Smith, Melissa Rorie, & Natalie Schell‐Busey. (2012). PROTOCOL: Corporate Crime Deterrence. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 8(1). 1–28.2 indexed citations
11.
Smith, N. Craig. (2011). Responsible consumers and stakeholder marketing: building a virtuous circle of social responsibility. Universia business review. 68–78.8 indexed citations
12.
Billington, Elizabeth J., Diane Donovan, & N. Craig Smith. (2008). Packing a complete graph of order 5 (mod 6) with triangles: a new method. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 53(4). 77–81.
13.
Klein, Jill G. & N. Craig Smith. (2004). Forewarning A Debriefing As Remedies to Deception in Consumer Research: an Empirical Study. Advances in consumer research.1 indexed citations
14.
Klein, Jill G., N. Craig Smith, & Andrew John. (2004). Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation. Journal of Marketing. 68(3). 92–109.650 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Klein, Jill G., N. Craig Smith, & Andrew John. (2003). Consumer Motivations For Boycott Participation: a Field Study. ACR European Advances.1 indexed citations
16.
Klein, Jill G., N. Craig Smith, & Andrew John. (2002). Exploring Motivations For Participation in a Consumer Boycott. Advances in consumer research. 29(1). 363–369.88 indexed citations
17.
Smith, N. Craig. (1998). Presidential Session Summary Ethics in Consumer Research. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
18.
Smith, N. Craig, Robert J. Thomas, & John A. Quelch. (1996). A Strategic Approach to Managing Product Recalls. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 3(14). 228–229.62 indexed citations
19.
Klein, Jill G. & N. Craig Smith. (1995). Ethical Issues in Consumer Research: Consumer and Researcher Perspectives. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
20.
Kaufmann, Patrick J., et al.. (1993). Deception in Retail Sale Pricing. ACR European Advances.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.