Markus Scholz

510 total citations
17 papers, 298 citations indexed

About

Markus Scholz is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Information Systems and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Markus Scholz has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 298 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Strategy and Management, 5 papers in Information Systems and Management and 4 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Markus Scholz's work include Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). Markus Scholz is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). Markus Scholz collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Markus Scholz's co-authors include N. Craig Smith, Thomas A. C. Reydon, Barbara Kump, Cristina Neesham, Dennis Schoeneborn, Andreas Georg Scherer, Isabella Hatak, Matthias Fink, Simon Down and Laura J. Spence and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal of Business Ethics and California Management Review.

In The Last Decade

Markus Scholz

17 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Markus Scholz
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Strategy and Management 172
  • Marketing 105
  • Sociology and Political Science 60
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 53
  • Information Systems and Management 50
Replace Thomas Beschorner with:
Thomas Beschorner Switzerland
Eva‐Maria Hammann Germany
Sajjad Nawaz Khan Pakistan
Agnieszka Małecka Poland
Bertrand Valiorgue France
Min‐Shi Liu Taiwan
Maria João Santos Portugal
Nabeel Rehman Pakistan
Luís M. de Castro Portugal
Marcel Stierl Germany
Thomas Beschorner Switzerland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Markus Scholz
Markus Scholz · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Markus Scholz
Markus Scholz · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Scholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Scholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Scholz. The network helps show where Markus Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Scholz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Scholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Scholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Scholz. Markus Scholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 10
3 4
4 5
5 10
6 6
7 17
8 20
9 2
10 90
11 85
12
Beyond the 'Win-Win': Creating Shared Value Requires Ethical Frameworks
8
13 1
14 16
15 4
16 13
17 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026