Meredith DiPietro

844 citations
11 papers · 507 indexed · h-index 9

Meredith DiPietro

11 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Meredith DiPietro
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Family Practice 33
  • Education 292
  • Computer Science Applications 51
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 109
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Lise McCoy with:
Lise McCoy United States
Daniel Tolks Germany
Hyuksoon S. Song United States
Stylianos Hatzipanagos United Kingdom
Mildred Vanessa López Cabrera Mexico
Kalyani Premkumar Canada
Maria Kambouri United Kingdom
Jan Zottmann Germany
Anneliese Lilienthal Sweden
Bas A. de Leng Netherlands
Meredith DiPietro relative to Lise McCoy United States Lise McCoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Lise McCoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith DiPietro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith DiPietro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith DiPietro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith DiPietro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith DiPietro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith DiPietro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith DiPietro. The network helps show where Meredith DiPietro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith DiPietro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith DiPietro Line = papers co-authored together Meredith DiPietro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201318
2
Virtual School Teaching: Establishing a Framework for K-12 Virtual School Professional Development Programs
20111
3 201116
4
Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers
2010124
5 201041
6 201014
7
Virtual Schooling Standards and Best Practices for Teacher Education
200976
8
Developing a Survey to Measure Best Practices of K-12 Online Instructors
20096
9 200825
10
Towards a Framework for Understanding Electronic Educational Gaming
200729
11 2006157

About Meredith DiPietro

Meredith DiPietro is a scholar working on Family Practice, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (33 citations), Education (292 citations) and Computer Science Applications (51 citations). Meredith DiPietro has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard E. Ferdig, Erik W. Black, Kara Dawson, Terence Cavanaugh, Robert Dickerson, Andrew Raij, Margaret Duerson, Cyrus Harrison, Kyle Johnsen and Jonathan Hernandez. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Educational Computing Research and American Journal of Distance Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026