Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Ferdig
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Ferdig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Ferdig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Ferdig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Ferdig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Ferdig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Ferdig. The network helps show where Richard E. Ferdig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard E. Ferdig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard E. Ferdig.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard E. Ferdig based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard E. Ferdig. Richard E. Ferdig is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ferdig, Richard E., Terence Cavanaugh, Meredith DiPietro, Erik W. Black, & Kara Dawson. (2009). Virtual Schooling Standards and Best Practices for Teacher Education. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 17(4). 479–503.76 indexed citations
10.
Beck, Dennis & Richard E. Ferdig. (2008). Evolving Roles of Online and Face-to-Face Instructors in a Lecture/Lab Hybrid Course.. The turkish online journal of educational technology. 7(1). 5–17.12 indexed citations
11.
Dawson, Kara, et al.. (2006). Forgotten Alumni: Online Learners as Donors. Academic exchange quarterly. 10(1). 43–47.4 indexed citations
12.
Dawson, Kara & Richard E. Ferdig. (2006). Commentary: Expanding Notions of Acceptable Research Evidence in Educational Technology--A Response to Schrum et al.. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 6(1). 133–142.12 indexed citations
13.
Ferdig, Richard E. & Kaye D. Sweetser. (2004). Content Delivery in the "Blogosphere". THE journal. 31(7). 12.171 indexed citations
14.
Ferdig, Richard E. & Punya Mishra. (2004). Emotional Responses to Computers: Experiences in Unfairness, Anger, and Spite. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 13(2). 143–161.39 indexed citations
15.
Ferdig, Richard E., Punya Mishra, & Yong Zhao. (2004). Component Architectures and Web-Based Learning Environments.. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 15(1). 75–90.11 indexed citations
16.
Ferdig, Richard E., et al.. (2003). Cohorts, e-learning, and technology integration: Technology diffusion in three pre-service literacy classrooms. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2003(1). 953–956.1 indexed citations
17.
Ferdig, Richard E., et al.. (2003). Thoughtful Creation of Online Course Content: Implications of SCORM for Educators. Academic exchange quarterly. 7(1). 158–163.2 indexed citations
18.
Zhao, Yong, Joe L. Byers, Punya Mishra, et al.. (2001). What Do They Know?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education. 17(2). 24–36.15 indexed citations
19.
Ferdig, Richard E.. (1997). Teaching Technology Through Story: Learning to Make Sense of the Story Developer. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 12(4). 475–490.3 indexed citations
20.
Ferdig, Richard E., Yong Zhao, & Punya Mishra. (1997). Duct tape and magic: Component architectures and web based learning environments. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.