Maria Charalampous
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Topics
- Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)Technostress in Professional Settings (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementSocial PsychologySociology and Political Science
- Journals
- European Journal of Work and Organizational PsychologyEmployee RelationsPure (Coventry University)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Maria Charalampous
5 papers receiving 611 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 388
- Social Psychology 255
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 239
- General Health Professions 123
- Economics and Econometrics 114
Countries citing papers authored by Maria Charalampous
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Charalampous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Charalampous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Charalampous more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Charalampous
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Charalampous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Charalampous. The network helps show where Maria Charalampous may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Charalampous
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Charalampous. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Charalampous based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Charalampous. Maria Charalampous is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 44 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 148 | |
| 5 | Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approachbreakdown → | 432 |
About Maria Charalampous
Maria Charalampous is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Demography and Social Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Technostress in Professional Settings (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (239 citations), Social Psychology (255 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (388 citations). Maria Charalampous has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Tramontano, Christine Grant, Evie Michailidis, Peter Spurgeon and Louise Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Employee Relations and Pure (Coventry University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.