Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Health Benefits of Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics
202464 citationsNasser Al‐Habsi, M. C. Elias et al.Nutrientsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Elias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Elias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Elias more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Elias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Elias. The network helps show where M. C. Elias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. C. Elias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. C. Elias.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. C. Elias based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. C. Elias. M. C. Elias is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Al‐Habsi, Nasser, et al.. (2024). Health Benefits of Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics. Nutrients. 16(22). 3955–3955.64 indexed citations breakdown →
Gutkoski, Luiz Carlos, et al.. (2012). Compostos antioxidantes em aveia. Current Agricultural Science and Technology. 18(4). 292–303.1 indexed citations
9.
Helbig, Elizabete, Elessandra da Rosa Zavareze, Fernanda Aliñe de Moura, et al.. (2012). Lipid profiles of rats fed with diets supplemented with vitamins niacin and pyridoxine. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
10.
Durigon, Angelise, et al.. (2010). Estudo comparativo entre métodos de extração de β-glicanas em grãos de aveia branca. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 21(2). 183–189.
11.
Moura, Fernanda Aliñe de, et al.. (2010). Biscoitos tipo “cookie” elaborados com diferentes frações de semente de abóbora (Curcubita máxima) Cookie elaborated with different fractions of pumpkin seed (Curcubita maxima). Alimentos e Nutrição. 21(4). 579–585.9 indexed citations
12.
Zavareze, Elessandra da Rosa, et al.. (2009). Propriedades nutricionais, tecnológicas e sensoriais de biscoitos com substituição de farinha de trigo por farinha de aveia ou farinha de arroz parboilizado. Alimentos e Nutrição. 20(1). 15–24.28 indexed citations
Lorini, I., B. Bacaltchuk, H. Beckel, et al.. (2006). Updates on the global application of Eco2Fume and Vaporph3OS® phosphine fumigants.. 10(5). 642–650.3 indexed citations
Radünz, Lauri Lourenço, et al.. (2006). Effect of storage method on the physical and biological quality of maize grains.. 31(2). 136–143.1 indexed citations
19.
Elias, M. C., et al.. (2005). Industrial performance of rice dried with air heated by burning firewood and LPG. 30(1). 8–15.1 indexed citations
20.
Elias, M. C., et al.. (2005). Effect of stationary and intermittent drying and duration of storage on the industrial performance of rice grains.. 30(1). 83–90.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.