K.W. Chapman
Impact in
- Food Science top 5%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Wine Industry and Tourism 2
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 7
- Co-authors
- Kathryn J. BoorHarry T. LawlessJoe M. RegensteinD.K. BandlerArmand V. CardelloKeum Taek HwangGregory M. PeckOlga I. Padilla‐Zakour
- Journals
- Journal of Sensory Studies (5 papers)Journal of Food Science (3 papers)Journal of Dairy Science (3 papers)HortScience (1 paper)Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
K.W. Chapman
13 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Food Science 268
- Animal Science and Zoology 138
- Nutrition and Dietetics 143
- Sensory Systems 36
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 9
Countries citing papers authored by K.W. Chapman
This map shows the geographic impact of K.W. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.W. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.W. Chapman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K.W. Chapman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.W. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.W. Chapman. The network helps show where K.W. Chapman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside K.W. Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 146 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 15 |
About K.W. Chapman
K.W. Chapman is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Sensory Systems and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (2 papers) and Wine Industry and Tourism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (268 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (138 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (143 citations), Sensory Systems (36 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (9 citations). K.W. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn J. Boor, Harry T. Lawless, Joe M. Regenstein, D.K. Bandler, Armand V. Cardello, Keum Taek Hwang, Gregory M. Peck, Olga I. Padilla‐Zakour, Christopher B. Watkins and Ian A. Merwin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sensory Studies, Journal of Food Science, Journal of Dairy Science, HortScience and Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.