Laurence Fillion

736 total citations
9 papers, 500 citations indexed

About

Laurence Fillion is a scholar working on Food Science, Sensory Systems and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurence Fillion has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 500 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Food Science, 4 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Laurence Fillion's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers). Laurence Fillion is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers). Laurence Fillion collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Finland. Laurence Fillion's co-authors include D. Kilcast, Christiani Jeyakumar Henry, Liisa Lähteenmäki, Katariina Roininen, Nicolas Pineau, David Labbé, Andréas Rytz, Mireille Moser and Mélissa Lepage and has published in prestigious journals such as Food Research International, Physiology & Behavior and Food Quality and Preference.

In The Last Decade

Laurence Fillion

9 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laurence Fillion United Kingdom 8 241 194 124 66 60 9 500
Marina Peparaio Italy 16 349 1.4× 235 1.2× 184 1.5× 91 1.4× 45 0.8× 30 695
Massimiliano Magli Italy 12 250 1.0× 163 0.8× 120 1.0× 23 0.3× 102 1.7× 28 504
G. Caporale Italy 11 461 1.9× 228 1.2× 122 1.0× 97 1.5× 137 2.3× 13 707
Edoardo Gatti Italy 14 204 0.8× 206 1.1× 102 0.8× 38 0.6× 17 0.3× 30 511
Marina Leite Mitterer‐Daltoé Brazil 14 347 1.4× 107 0.6× 118 1.0× 70 1.1× 15 0.3× 50 563
Soh Min Lee South Korea 11 328 1.4× 80 0.4× 137 1.1× 46 0.7× 18 0.3× 19 490
Federica Tesini Italy 7 229 1.0× 70 0.4× 97 0.8× 41 0.6× 57 0.9× 9 445
Felipe Richter Reis Brazil 14 322 1.3× 94 0.5× 162 1.3× 62 0.9× 11 0.2× 23 446
Antonio Mincione Italy 13 243 1.0× 129 0.7× 82 0.7× 20 0.3× 86 1.4× 30 418
Vladimí­r Vietoris Slovakia 12 225 0.9× 116 0.6× 103 0.8× 22 0.3× 12 0.2× 44 455

Countries citing papers authored by Laurence Fillion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Fillion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Fillion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Fillion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence Fillion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Fillion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Fillion. The network helps show where Laurence Fillion may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence Fillion

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence Fillion. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence Fillion based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence Fillion. Laurence Fillion is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Fillion, Laurence, et al.. (2023). Comparison of sensitivity to taste and astringency stimuli among vegans and omnivores. Physiology & Behavior. 262. 114092–114092. 6 indexed citations
2.
Pineau, Nicolas, et al.. (2022). Comparison of RATA, CATA, sorting and Napping® as rapid alternatives to sensory profiling in a food industry environment. Food Research International. 158. 111467–111467. 29 indexed citations
3.
Moser, Mireille, Mélissa Lepage, Nicolas Pineau, Laurence Fillion, & Andréas Rytz. (2017). Replicates in sensory profiling: Quantification of the impact of moving from two to one assessments. Food Quality and Preference. 65. 185–190. 14 indexed citations
4.
Roininen, Katariina, Laurence Fillion, D. Kilcast, & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2004). Exploring difficult textural properties of fruit and vegetables for the elderly in Finland and the United Kingdom. Food Quality and Preference. 15(6). 517–530. 27 indexed citations
5.
Roininen, Katariina, Laurence Fillion, D. Kilcast, & Liisa Lähteenmäki. (2003). PERCEIVED EATING DIFFICULTIES AND PREFERENCES FOR VARIOUS TEXTURES OF RAW AND COOKED CARROTS IN YOUNG AND ELDERLY SUBJECTS. Journal of Sensory Studies. 18(6). 437–451. 27 indexed citations
6.
Fillion, Laurence, et al.. (2002). Does organic food taste better? A claim substantiation approach. Nutrition & Food Science. 32(4). 153–157. 78 indexed citations
7.
Fillion, Laurence & D. Kilcast. (2002). Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables. Food Quality and Preference. 13(1). 23–29. 148 indexed citations
8.
Kilcast, D. & Laurence Fillion. (2001). Understanding consumer requirements for fruit and vegetable texture. Nutrition & Food Science. 31(5). 221–225. 10 indexed citations
9.
Fillion, Laurence & Christiani Jeyakumar Henry. (1998). Nutrient losses and gains during frying: a review. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 49(2). 157–168. 161 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026