Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers
2007685 citationsKimberly A. Lawless et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly A. Lawless
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly A. Lawless's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly A. Lawless with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly A. Lawless more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly A. Lawless
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly A. Lawless. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly A. Lawless. The network helps show where Kimberly A. Lawless may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly A. Lawless
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly A. Lawless.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly A. Lawless based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly A. Lawless. Kimberly A. Lawless is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lawless, Kimberly A., et al.. (2017). Is Anyone Watching the Course Video? Inferring Elapsed Watch Time and Video Engagement Patterns When Using Embedded Videos from Youtube, Vimeo, or Other Third-Party Video Streaming Services for Moodle and Other Online Learning Management Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Brown, Scott W., et al.. (2016). Increasing Students' Science Writing Skills through a PBL Simulation.. International Association for Development of the Information Society.5 indexed citations
5.
Yukhymenko, Mariya, et al.. (2014). Thematic Analysis of Teacher Instructional Practices and Student Responses in Middle School Classrooms with Problem-Based Learning Environment.. 1(3). 93–110.36 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Scott W., Kimberly A. Lawless, & Mark A. Boyer. (2009). The GlobalEd 2 Project: Expanding the Science and Literacy Curricular Space. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2009(1). 160–164.1 indexed citations
7.
Schrader, P. G. & Kimberly A. Lawless. (2008). Gamer Discretion Advised: How MMOG Players Determine the Quality and Usefulness of Online Resources. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 710–715.1 indexed citations
8.
Goldman, Susan R., et al.. (2008). Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 19–26.1 indexed citations
9.
Schrader, P. G., Kimberly A. Lawless, & Hayley J. Mayall. (2008). The model of domain learning as a framework for understanding Internet navigation. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 17(2). 235–258.9 indexed citations
Smolin, Louanne, Kimberly A. Lawless, Josh Radinsky, & Mark Newman. (2003). School-University Collaborative Design Teams: Curriculum Design as a Vehicle for Professional Development in Teaching with Technology. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2003(1). 3775–3778.3 indexed citations
12.
Smolin, Louanne & Kimberly A. Lawless. (2003). Becoming Literate in the Technological Age: New Responsibilities and Tools for Teachers. The Reading Teacher. 56(6).42 indexed citations
13.
Lawless, Kimberly A., Josh Radinsky, Louanne Smolin, & Mark Newman. (2003). Preparing Technology-Savvy Mentor Teachers For Preservice Field Experiences. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2003(1). 3830–3833.1 indexed citations
14.
Gerber, Ben S., et al.. (2002). Diabetes and Your Eyes: A Pilot Study on Multimedia Education for Underserved Populations. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 1026–1026.1 indexed citations
15.
Lawless, Kimberly A.. (2002). Diabetes and Your Eyes: A Pilot Study on Multimedia Education for Underserved Populations. International journal of instructional media. 2002(1). 1074–1079.4 indexed citations
Gibbons, Andrew S., et al.. (2001). The Web and model-centered instruction. 137–146.6 indexed citations
18.
Lawless, Kimberly A., et al.. (2000). To Teach How Or To Teach With: Four University’s Approaches To Technology Integration For Teacher Preparation. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2000(1). 561–565.1 indexed citations
19.
Lawless, Kimberly A. & Everett V. Smith. (1997). Teacher Beliefs about Instructional Media: Confirmatory Factor Structure.. International journal of instructional media. 24(3).2 indexed citations
20.
Lawless, Kimberly A., Scott W. Brown, & Matthew Cartter. (1997). Applying Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology to Health Care Issues: Combating Lyme Disease.. International journal of instructional media. 24(4).13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.