Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”
2012685 citationsJasmin Joecks, Kerstin Pull et al.Journal of Business Ethicsprofile →
Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of Kerstin Pull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerstin Pull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerstin Pull more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerstin Pull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerstin Pull. The network helps show where Kerstin Pull may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kerstin Pull
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kerstin Pull.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kerstin Pull based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kerstin Pull. Kerstin Pull is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Joecks, Jasmin, Kerstin Pull, & Karin Vetter. (2012). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics. 118(1). 61–72.685 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Güth, Werner, et al.. (2011). Creativity, Analytical Skills, Personality Traits, and Innovation Game Behavior in the Lab: An Experiment. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Pull, Kerstin, et al.. (2010). Committing to Incentives: Should the Decision to Sanction be Revealed or Hidden?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
14.
Pull, Kerstin, et al.. (2010). Warum Vaeter ihre Erwerbstaetigkeit (nicht) unterbrechen. Mikrooekonomische versus in der Persoenlichkeit des Vaters begruendete Determinanten der Inanspruchnahme von Elternzeit durch Vaeter (Why Fathers (Don’t) Take Parental Leave. Microeconomic vs. Personality Based Determinants). RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 24(1). 49–68.1 indexed citations
Alewell, Dorothea & Kerstin Pull. (2005). Die Neugestaltung der Finanzierung des Mutterschutzes - ein Kommentar zum Mutterschutz-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes. Econstor (Econstor). 58(4). 22–27.
17.
Pull, Kerstin. (2003). Übertarifliche Entlohnung: ein Ergebnis vorweggenommener Verhandlungen (Wages above the collectively agreed level: a result of anticipated negotiations). Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 29(4). 607–615.1 indexed citations
18.
Pull, Kerstin & Dorothea Alewell. (2003). An International Comparison and Assessment of Maternity Leave Legislation. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
19.
Backes‐Gellner, Uschi & Kerstin Pull. (1999). Betriebliche Sozialpolitik und Maximierung des Shareholder Value: ein Widerspruch? Eine empirische Analyse alternativer Erklärungsansätze. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 69(1). 51–70.4 indexed citations
20.
Sadowski, Dieter, Kerstin Pull, & Martin Schneider. (1998). Vertrauen: Voraussetzung oder Ergebnis effizienter Arbeitsbeziehungen? - Gutenbergs Solidaritätsaxiom und die institutionenökonomische Unternehmenstheorie. Econstor (Econstor).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.