Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda
20091.2k citationsSiri Terjesen, Ruth Sealy et al.Corporate Governance An International Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Sealy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Sealy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Sealy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Sealy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Sealy. The network helps show where Ruth Sealy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Sealy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Sealy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Sealy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Sealy. Ruth Sealy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Michelon, Giovanna, Ruth Sealy, & Grzegorz Trojanowski. (2020). Understanding research findings and evidence on corporate reporting: An independent literature review. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).16 indexed citations
Sealy, Ruth, et al.. (2017). The Female FTSE Board Report: Putting UK progress into a global perspective.. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London).3 indexed citations
9.
Sealy, Ruth, et al.. (2017). The Female FTSE Board Report: Taking Stock of Where we are.. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London).2 indexed citations
10.
Silvester, Jo, et al.. (2017). Women in power. Organizational Dynamics. 47(3). 189–199.7 indexed citations
Vinnicombe, Susan, et al.. (2015). The Female FTSE Board Report 2015. CERES (Cranfield University).22 indexed citations
16.
Sealy, Ruth & Susan Vinnicombe. (2013). The Female FTSE Board Report 2013: False Dawn of Progress for Women on Boards?. CERES (Cranfield University).14 indexed citations
Vinnicombe, Susan, et al.. (2010). The Female FTSE Board Report 2010: Opening up the Appointment Process. CERES (Cranfield University).9 indexed citations
19.
Sealy, Ruth, et al.. (2010). Standard Chartered Bank: Women on Corporate Boards in India 2010. CERES (Cranfield University).11 indexed citations
20.
Terjesen, Siri, Ruth Sealy, & Val Singh. (2009). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance An International Review. 17(3). 320–337.1184 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.