Julia Flutter

1.5k total citations
15 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Julia Flutter is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Flutter has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Julia Flutter's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (3 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers). Julia Flutter is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (6 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (3 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers). Julia Flutter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Julia Flutter's co-authors include Jean Rudduck, Ian Hosking, P. John Clarkson, Eve Bearne, Helen Demetriou and Ruth Kershner and has published in prestigious journals such as Cambridge Journal of Education, Educational Review and The Curriculum Journal.

In The Last Decade

Julia Flutter

14 papers receiving 873 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Flutter United Kingdom 8 876 449 87 80 70 15 1.0k
Glenda MacNaughton Australia 15 839 1.0× 532 1.2× 92 1.1× 65 0.8× 39 0.6× 37 1.1k
Janice Huber Canada 15 735 0.8× 391 0.9× 55 0.6× 45 0.6× 43 0.6× 34 1.1k
Liz Jones United Kingdom 15 419 0.5× 321 0.7× 78 0.9× 52 0.7× 31 0.4× 44 761
Dorinda J. Carter Andrews United States 17 898 1.0× 585 1.3× 62 0.7× 102 1.3× 36 0.5× 29 1.1k
Ann Locke Davidson United States 8 708 0.8× 271 0.6× 127 1.5× 113 1.4× 23 0.3× 19 910
Louise Derman-Sparks United States 9 669 0.8× 398 0.9× 64 0.7× 52 0.7× 26 0.4× 18 905
Diane M. Hoffman United States 15 435 0.5× 300 0.7× 57 0.7× 83 1.0× 66 0.9× 39 725
Malcolm Thorburn United Kingdom 17 419 0.5× 395 0.9× 131 1.5× 78 1.0× 56 0.8× 85 908
Sonja Sheridan Sweden 20 966 1.1× 304 0.7× 206 2.4× 43 0.5× 33 0.5× 54 1.1k
Yeh Hsueh United States 10 469 0.5× 242 0.5× 84 1.0× 32 0.4× 44 0.6× 31 706

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Flutter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Flutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Flutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Flutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Flutter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Flutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Flutter. The network helps show where Julia Flutter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Flutter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Flutter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Flutter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Flutter. Julia Flutter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
2.
Flutter, Julia, et al.. (2020). Inspiring Primary Curriculum Design. 5 indexed citations
3.
Flutter, Julia, et al.. (2013). Joining up the DOTs: authentic teaching and learning in Design and Technology education. Cambridge Journal of Education. 43(4). 435–450. 4 indexed citations
5.
Flutter, Julia, et al.. (2007). Cómo mejorar tu centro escolar dando la voz al alumnado. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 30 indexed citations
6.
Flutter, Julia. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. The Curriculum Journal. 18(3). 343–354. 136 indexed citations
7.
Flutter, Julia. (2006). ‘This place could help you learn’: student participation in creating better school environments. Educational Review. 58(2). 183–193. 53 indexed citations
8.
Flutter, Julia & Jean Rudduck. (2004). Consulting Pupils. 217 indexed citations
9.
Flutter, Julia & Jean Rudduck. (2004). Consulting Pupils: What's In It For Schools?. TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University). 237 indexed citations
10.
Bearne, Eve, et al.. (2001). ‘Testing, testing, testing… can you hear me?’. Education 3-13. 29(3). 43–46. 2 indexed citations
11.
Flutter, Julia, et al.. (2000). Taking their word for it: Can listening, and responding, to pupils' views give new directions for school improvement?. Education 3-13. 28(3). 46–51. 8 indexed citations
12.
Rudduck, Jean & Julia Flutter. (2000). Pupil Participation and Pupil Perspective: 'carving a new order of experience'. Cambridge Journal of Education. 30(1). 75–89. 329 indexed citations
13.
Flutter, Julia, et al.. (1999). Exploring and Explaining ‘Dips’ in Motivation and Performance in Primary and Secondary Schooling. Research in Education. 61(1). 29–38. 15 indexed citations
14.
Kershner, Ruth, Julia Flutter, & Jean Rudduck. (1998). Teacher research as a basis ® for school improvement: but is it useful beyond the school in which it was carried out?. Improving Schools. 1(2). 59–62. 4 indexed citations
15.
Flutter, Julia, et al.. (1998). Year 8 - a Suitable Case for ® School Improvement. Improving Schools. 1(3). 39–42. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026