Ian Hosking
- Demography top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
- Co-authors
- P. John ClarksonSam WallerMike BradleyJames WardJoy Goodman-DeaneNicola M. HeronAlberto MarzoPeter E. Langdon
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers)Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers)Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
Ian Hosking
18 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Demography 57
- Human-Computer Interaction 50
- Management of Technology and Innovation 49
- Mechanical Engineering 45
- Occupational Therapy 38
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Hosking
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Hosking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Hosking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Hosking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Hosking
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Hosking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Hosking. The network helps show where Ian Hosking may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Hosking
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Hosking. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Hosking based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Hosking. Ian Hosking is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 91 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF TWO ELECTRONIC BLADDER DIARIES; A PILOT STUDY | 1 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | Comparison of the usability of three autoinjectors | 1 |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Inclusive design toolkit | 91 |
| 17 | Whose design is it anyway? | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Improving prediction of site remediation costs | 0 |
About Ian Hosking
Ian Hosking is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Human-Computer Interaction and Family Practice, having authored 19 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (50 citations), Occupational Therapy (38 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (49 citations). Ian Hosking has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include P. John Clarkson, Sam Waller, Mike Bradley, James Ward, Joy Goodman-Deane, Nicola M. Heron, Alberto Marzo, Peter E. Langdon, J. P. Bell and Abdel‐Hamid Soliman. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Neurourology and Urodynamics and Emergency Medicine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.