Countries citing papers authored by Jon E. Pedersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jon E. Pedersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon E. Pedersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon E. Pedersen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon E. Pedersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon E. Pedersen. The network helps show where Jon E. Pedersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon E. Pedersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon E. Pedersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon E. Pedersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jon E. Pedersen. Jon E. Pedersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Claes, D. R., et al.. (2018). Physics Teachers as Physics Experts: Research Participation as Professional Development.. Science educator. 26(2). 90–101.1 indexed citations
Nugent, Gwen, et al.. (2016). The Effectiveness of Technology-Delivered Science Instructional Coaching in Middle and High School. Working Paper..1 indexed citations
4.
Pedersen, Jon E., et al.. (2014). Do You Hear What I Hear.. Science and Children. 51(6). 56–63.
5.
Totten, Samuel & Jon E. Pedersen. (2012). Educating about Social Issues in the 20th and 21st Centuries: A Critical Annotated Bibliography. Research in Curriculum and Instruction. Volume 1..1 indexed citations
6.
Totten, Samuel & Jon E. Pedersen. (2010). Teaching and Studying Social Issues: Major Programs and Approaches. Research in Curriculum and Instruction..1 indexed citations
Türkmen, Hakan, et al.. (2008). Evaluating Science Education Reform via Fourth-Grade Students' Image of Science Teaching.. Science education international. 19(1). 27–40.3 indexed citations
9.
Marek, Edmund A., et al.. (2007). CLSI: Cool Life Science Investigations.. Science and Children. 45(4). 26–29.1 indexed citations
10.
Pedersen, Jon E. & Edmund A. Marek. (2007). Technology Integration: PDAs as an Instructional and Reflective Tool in the Science Classroom. Insecta mundi. 7(1). 521–528.4 indexed citations
11.
Totten, Samuel & Jon E. Pedersen. (2007). Addressing social issues in the classroom and beyond : the pedagogical efforts of pioneers in the field.11 indexed citations
12.
Türkmen, Hakan, et al.. (2007). Evaluation of Pre-Service Teachers' Images of Science Teaching in Turkey.. Insecta mundi. 8(1).21 indexed citations
Pedersen, Jon E., et al.. (2005). Evaluative Case Study of a Summer Academy Program. Insecta mundi. 9(4). 1.4 indexed citations
16.
Totten, Samuel & Jon E. Pedersen. (2005). Researching and teaching social issues : the personal stories and pedagogical efforts of professors of education. Lexington Books.1 indexed citations
17.
Pedersen, Jon E., et al.. (2002). Making the Invisible Visible: The Oklahoma Science Project.. Science education international. 13(3). 16–21.1 indexed citations
18.
Crawley, Frank E. & Jon E. Pedersen. (2002). Collaborating to Study Science Teaching: A Case Study. Insecta mundi. 7(1). 1–34.
Pedersen, Jon E., et al.. (1998). Warming Up To Physics.. The Science Teacher. 65(1). 24–28.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.