Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by John Q. Easton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Q. Easton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Q. Easton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Q. Easton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Q. Easton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Q. Easton. The network helps show where John Q. Easton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Q. Easton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Q. Easton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Q. Easton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Q. Easton. John Q. Easton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jackson, C. Kirabo, et al.. (2020). School Effects on Socio-Emotional Development, School-Based Arrests, and Educational Attainment. NBER Working Paper No. 26759.. National Bureau of Economic Research.1 indexed citations
Roderick, Melissa, John Q. Easton, & Penny Bender Sebring. (2009). A New Model for the Role of Research in Supporting Urban School Reform..8 indexed citations
Easton, John Q., et al.. (2001). Annual CPS Test Trend Review, 2000. Research Data Brief. Academic Productivity Series, 2000 Results..2 indexed citations
9.
Roderick, Melissa, et al.. (2000). Update: Ending Social Promotion--Passing, Retention, and Achievement among Promoted and Retained Students, 1995-1999. Charting Reform in Chicago Series: Data Brief..18 indexed citations
10.
Easton, John Q., Brian Jacob, Stuart Luppescu, & Melissa Roderick. (1998). Adjusting Citywide ITBS Scores for Student Retention in Grades Three, Six, and Eight. Research Data Brief.. Anticancer Research. 33(3). 1189–93.1 indexed citations
11.
Easton, John Q.. (1991). Decision Making and School Improvement. LSCs in the First Two Years of Reform..11 indexed citations
12.
Easton, John Q.. (1990). Securing Participation of Schools for an In-Depth Observational Study..
13.
Easton, John Q., et al.. (1990). Attendance in Chicago Public Schools. Monitoring and Researching the Effects of School Reform in Chicago Series..1 indexed citations
Easton, John Q. & Rick Ginsberg. (1983). Student Learning Processes: How Poorly Prepared Students Succeed in College.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 1(1). 12–37.2 indexed citations
18.
Ginsberg, Rick & John Q. Easton. (1983). Increasing Student Success Early in the Semester..1 indexed citations
19.
Easton, John Q. & Thomas R. Guskey. (1982). Estimating the Effects of College, Department, Teacher and Course on Course Completion Rates.. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 115(11). 1082–4.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.