Countries where authors publish in Journal of Labor Economics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Labor Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Labor Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Labor Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Labor Economics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Labor Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Labor Economics.
About Journal of Labor Economics
The 1.4k papers published in Journal of Labor Economics in the last decades have received a total of 107.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Labor Economics usually cover Public Administration (135 papers), Economics and Econometrics (957 papers) and Gender Studies (310 papers) specifically the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (617 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (288 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (182 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (144 papers), School Choice and Performance (142 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (135 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (124 papers) and Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Labor Economics are Gary S. Becker, George J. Borjas, David Card, David Autor, Andrew J. Oswald, Derek Neal, Edward P. Lazear, Robert W. Fairlie, Nigel Tomes and Barry R. Chiswick.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.