Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Luppescu
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Luppescu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Luppescu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Luppescu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Luppescu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Luppescu. The network helps show where Stuart Luppescu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Luppescu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Luppescu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Luppescu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Luppescu. Stuart Luppescu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ehrlich, Stacy B., et al.. (2016). The Development and Testing of a New Measure of Early Childhood Education Organizational Conditions.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.2 indexed citations
4.
Luppescu, Stuart. (2016). On the Appropriateness of Surveying Students in 4th and 5th Grades.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.1 indexed citations
5.
Sartain, Lauren, et al.. (2013). Rethinking Teacher Evaluation in Chicago: Lessons Learned from Classroom Observations, Principal-Teacher Conferences, and District Implementation.53 indexed citations
6.
Luppescu, Stuart, Elaine Allensworth, Paul Moore, Marisa de la Torre, & James Murphy. (2011). Trends in Chicago's Schools across Three Eras of Reform: Summary of Key Findings. Research Summary..6 indexed citations
7.
Bryk, Anthony S., Penny Bender Sebring, Elaine Allensworth, John Q. Easton, & Stuart Luppescu. (2009). Organizing Schools for Improvement.173 indexed citations
8.
Easton, John Q., et al.. (2007). 2006 ISAT Reading and Math Scores in Chicago and the Rest of the State. Research Brief..2 indexed citations
9.
Sebring, Penny Bender, Elaine Allensworth, Anthony S. Bryk, John Q. Easton, & Stuart Luppescu. (2006). The Essential Supports for School Improvement.74 indexed citations
10.
Miller, Shazia Rafiullah, et al.. (2003). How Well Do Vivaldi Students Succeed after Elementary School? (Unit 8888)..1 indexed citations
11.
Luppescu, Stuart. (2002). DIF Detection in HLM..5 indexed citations
12.
Smylie, Mark A., et al.. (2001). Development of Chicago Annenberg Schools: 1996-1999. Improving Chicago's Schools. Report of the Chicago Annenberg Research Project..3 indexed citations
13.
Easton, John Q., Brian Jacob, Stuart Luppescu, & Melissa Roderick. (1998). Adjusting Citywide ITBS Scores for Student Retention in Grades Three, Six, and Eight. Research Data Brief.. Anticancer Research. 33(3). 1189–93.1 indexed citations
14.
Bryk, Anthony S., Yeow Meng Thum, John Q. Easton, & Stuart Luppescu. (1998). Academic Productivity of Chicago Public Elementary Schools. Examining Productivity Series. A Technical Report..19 indexed citations
15.
Bryk, Anthony S., et al.. (1997). Charting Reform: LSCs--Local Leadership at Work. A Report..2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.