John McWilliams
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Papers in
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 9
- Workplace Health and Well-being 8
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 2
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior 7
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty 1
- Co-authors
- John Rodwell (8 shared papers)Andrew Noblet (8 shared papers)Stephen Teo (2 shared papers)Joseph Graffam (1 shared paper)Rebecca L. Flower (1 shared paper)Defne Demir (2 shared papers)Cary L. Cooper (1 shared paper)Peter Steane (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
John McWilliams
13 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 178
- Research and Theory 12
- Public Administration 25
- Leadership and Management 8
- General Health Professions 132
Countries citing papers authored by John McWilliams
This map shows the geographic impact of John McWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McWilliams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John McWilliams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McWilliams. The network helps show where John McWilliams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside John McWilliams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 12 | Work differences by sector for medical specialists: Evidence of a public sector ethos | 2012 | 1 |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 |
About John McWilliams
John McWilliams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Health Information Management, Sociology and Political Science and Demography, having authored 13 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (178 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Public Administration (25 citations), Leadership and Management (8 citations) and General Health Professions (132 citations). John McWilliams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John Rodwell, Andrew Noblet, Stephen Teo, Joseph Graffam, Rebecca L. Flower, Defne Demir, Cary L. Cooper, Peter Steane and Dianne Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of Managerial Psychology, International Journal of Public Administration, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology and Work & Stress.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.