Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management25.6k
Social Psychology23.5k
Sociology and Political Science17.1k
Clinical Psychology9.7k
Replace Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology with:
Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyUnited States
Journal of Occupational Health PsychologyUnited States
European Journal of Work and Organizational PsychologyNetherlands
Organizational Research MethodsUnited States
Annual Review of Public HealthUnited States
International Journal of Stress ManagementUnited States
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary JournalUnited States
Human Resource Management ReviewUnited States
Anxiety Stress & CopingUnited States
Organizational DynamicsUnited States
Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Work & Stress
Work & Stress · 1×
×0.619.4kGHP
×2.052.0kOBHRM
×1.331.0kSP
×1.525.0kSPS
×1.110.2kCP
Citations per year, relative to Work & Stress
Work & Stress · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Work & Stress
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Work & Stress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Work & Stress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Work & Stress more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Work & Stress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Work & Stress.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.