Work & Stress

995 papers and 59.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 995 papers published in Work & Stress in the last decades have received a total of 59.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Work & Stress usually cover General Health Professions (594 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (376 papers) and Social Psychology (322 papers) specifically the topics of Workplace Health and Well-being (465 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (365 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (198 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Work & Stress are Toon W. Taris, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Karina Nielsen, Stan Maes, Hans De Witte, Margot van der Doef, Peter Warr, Karl Bang Christensen, Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben and Guy Notelaers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Work & Stress

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Work & Stress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Work & Stress.

Countries where authors publish in Work & Stress

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Work & Stress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Work & Stress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Work & Stress more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025