Dianne Johnson

518 total citations
27 papers, 269 citations indexed

About

Dianne Johnson is a scholar working on Oncology, Literature and Literary Theory and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Dianne Johnson has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 269 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 6 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Dianne Johnson's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers). Dianne Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers). Dianne Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Dianne Johnson's co-authors include Karen J. Wernli, Karla Kerlikowske, Louise M. Henderson, Tracy Onega, Diana S.M. Buist, Diana L. Miglioretti, Brian L. Sprague, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Anna N.A. Tosteson and Susan Brandzel and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Preventive Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Dianne Johnson

23 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dianne Johnson United States 9 117 68 67 48 43 27 269
Sue Hudson United Kingdom 11 122 1.0× 21 0.3× 84 1.3× 52 1.1× 75 1.7× 40 362
Daniel Vulkan United Kingdom 7 183 1.6× 43 0.6× 81 1.2× 72 1.5× 38 0.9× 19 315
David A. Montgomery United Kingdom 9 212 1.8× 148 2.2× 62 0.9× 30 0.6× 14 0.3× 14 410
Wanda Lucas United States 4 239 2.0× 163 2.4× 94 1.4× 60 1.3× 7 0.2× 5 369
Allison Stover Fiscalini United States 9 209 1.8× 103 1.5× 49 0.7× 19 0.4× 34 0.8× 24 421
Hee-Chul Shin South Korea 9 164 1.4× 156 2.3× 72 1.1× 32 0.7× 11 0.3× 35 417
Katherine Klein United States 7 102 0.9× 33 0.5× 95 1.4× 57 1.2× 7 0.2× 11 307
Carolina Chabrera Spain 10 118 1.0× 145 2.1× 37 0.6× 30 0.6× 13 0.3× 32 309
Jean S. Lee United States 7 65 0.6× 16 0.2× 40 0.6× 21 0.4× 3 0.1× 15 368
Mirar N. Bristol United States 10 101 0.9× 78 1.1× 24 0.4× 26 0.5× 21 0.5× 17 506

Countries citing papers authored by Dianne Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dianne Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dianne Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dianne Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dianne Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dianne Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dianne Johnson. The network helps show where Dianne Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dianne Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dianne Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dianne Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dianne Johnson. Dianne Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tosteson, Anna N.A., Karen E. Schifferdecker, Karen J. Wernli, et al.. (2022). Women's Breast Cancer Screening Confidence by Screening Modality and Breast Density: A Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Survey Study. Journal of Women s Health. 31(11). 1547–1556. 2 indexed citations
2.
Sprague, Brian L., Louise M. Henderson, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.. (2022). Breast Density Knowledge in a Screening Mammography Population Exposed to Density Notification. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 19(5). 615–624. 5 indexed citations
3.
Wernli, Karen J., Louise M. Henderson, Wenyan Zhao, et al.. (2022). Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: Pre-operative breast MRI and breast density. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 194(3). 607–616. 3 indexed citations
4.
Schifferdecker, Karen E., Karen J. Wernli, Diana S.M. Buist, et al.. (2021). Women's considerations and experiences for breast cancer screening and surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A focus group study. Preventive Medicine. 151. 106542–106542. 10 indexed citations
5.
Nekhlyudov, Larissa, Janie M. Lee, Sara H. Javid, et al.. (2020). Surveillance for second breast cancer events in women with a personal history of breast cancer using breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 181(2). 255–268. 18 indexed citations
6.
West, Tracey, et al.. (2019). Career Outcomes of Financial Planning Students. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 1 indexed citations
7.
Henderson, Louise M., Laura Ichikawa, Diana S.M. Buist, et al.. (2019). Patterns of Breast Imaging Use Among Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(10). 2098–2106. 9 indexed citations
8.
Schifferdecker, Karen E., Anna N.A. Tosteson, Celia P. Kaplan, et al.. (2019). Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of “Informed”. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 35(6). 1654–1660. 21 indexed citations
9.
Wernli, Karen J., Laura Ichikawa, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.. (2019). Surveillance Breast MRI and Mammography: Comparison in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer. Radiology. 292(2). 311–318. 49 indexed citations
10.
Johnson, Dianne, et al.. (2018). Success Rates for Retinal Detachment Repair in Alberta: A Physician Learning Program Initiative. Ophthalmologica. 241(3). 170–172. 5 indexed citations
11.
Brandzel, Susan, Dori E. Rosenberg, Dianne Johnson, et al.. (2017). Women’s experiences and preferences regarding breast imaging after completing breast cancer treatment. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 11. 199–204. 26 indexed citations
12.
Johnson, Dianne, et al.. (2016). Industry Demand for Financial Planning Graduates. 2(2). 106–124. 6 indexed citations
14.
Demir, Defne, et al.. (2012). Work differences by sector for medical specialists: Evidence of a public sector ethos. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 20(2). 75–90. 1 indexed citations
15.
Johnson, Dianne. (2009). Hairitage: Women Writing Race in Children's Literature. Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature. 28(2). 337–355. 2 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, Dianne. (2002). Lighting the Way: Reconciliation Stories. 6 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, Dianne. (1999). Who belongs to whom?: assimilation and deracination in Simi Bedford's Yoruba Girl Dancing. 37(2). 6–11. 1 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Dianne. (1990). Telling Tales: The Pedagogy and Promise of African American Literature for Youth. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 31 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Dianne. (1990). Perspectives on Unity and the African Diaspora: Examples from the Children's Literature of Lucille Clifton and Rosa Guy. Children's Literature Association quarterly. 1990(1). 55–59.
20.
Jacobs, Richard F., et al.. (1986). Cellular Uptake and Cell-Associated Activity of Third Generation Cephalosporins. Pediatric Research. 20(9). 909–912. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026