This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Turbill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Turbill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Turbill more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Turbill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Turbill. The network helps show where Jan Turbill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Turbill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Turbill.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Turbill based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Turbill. Jan Turbill is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Turbill, Jan & Brian Cambourne. (2007). Looking Back to Look Forward: Understanding the Present by Revisiting the Past: An Australian Perspective. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
3.
Turbill, Jan, et al.. (2006). Writing Instruction K-6: Understanding Process, Purpose, Audience. Research Online (University of Wollongong).4 indexed citations
4.
Turbill, Jan, et al.. (2006). Early Literacy and New Technologies in Australian Schools: Policy, Research, and Practice. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 93–108.16 indexed citations
5.
Kervin, Lisa, Brian Cambourne, Jan Turbill, et al.. (2005). From classroom reality to virtual classroom: the role of teacher-created scripts in the development of classroom simulation technology. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 84.2 indexed citations
6.
Ferry, Brian, Lisa Kervin, John Hedberg, et al.. (2005). Operationalizing Nine Design Elements of Authentic Learning Environments in a Classroom-based On-line Simulation. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 2005(1). 3096–3103.4 indexed citations
7.
Turbill, Jan. (2003). Exploring the Potential of the Digital Language Experience Approach in Australian Classrooms.. 6(7).11 indexed citations
8.
Turbill, Jan. (2003). Learning about Teaching Literacy from Children.. 6(6).1 indexed citations
9.
Kervin, Lisa & Jan Turbill. (2003). Teaching as a craft: making links between pre-service training and professional practice. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 22.11 indexed citations
10.
Turbill, Jan. (2002). The Four Ages of Reading Philosophy and Pedagogy: A Framework for Examining Theory and Practice.. 5(6).17 indexed citations
11.
Turbill, Jan. (2002). From face-to-face teaching to online distance education classes: some challenges and surprise. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 671–680.1 indexed citations
Turbill, Jan. (1993). From a personal theory to a grounded theory of staff development. Research Online (University of Wollongong).5 indexed citations
18.
Cambourne, Brian & Jan Turbill. (1991). Evaluation and the literacy curriculum: Who is in control?. 14(3). 181.1 indexed citations
19.
Turbill, Jan. (1985). Now, we want to write!.12 indexed citations
20.
Turbill, Jan, et al.. (1984). Towards a reading-writing classroom.34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.