James M. Comer

1.1k total citations
32 papers, 839 citations indexed

About

James M. Comer is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, James M. Comer has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 839 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in James M. Comer's work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (10 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). James M. Comer is often cited by papers focused on Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (10 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). James M. Comer collaborates with scholars based in United States and Latvia. James M. Comer's co-authors include Raj Mehta, Rajdeep Grewal, Rosemary R. Lagace, Karen A. Machleit, Frederick A. Russ, Kevin M. McNeilly, Norman T. Bruvold, B.J. Zirger, Richard E. Plank and Ellen Bolman Pullins and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Business Research.

In The Last Decade

James M. Comer

30 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James M. Comer United States 14 414 282 234 205 196 32 839
Jonathan D. Hibbard United States 8 512 1.2× 292 1.0× 239 1.0× 307 1.5× 98 0.5× 12 798
Kam-hon Lee Hong Kong 8 314 0.8× 255 0.9× 264 1.1× 159 0.8× 149 0.8× 13 818
Chester C. Borucki Netherlands 5 429 1.0× 272 1.0× 155 0.7× 100 0.5× 76 0.4× 5 845
Daulatram B. Lund United States 9 390 0.9× 214 0.8× 270 1.2× 214 1.0× 257 1.3× 13 968
Annie H. Liu United States 13 543 1.3× 311 1.1× 229 1.0× 394 1.9× 129 0.7× 20 970
David J. Good United States 17 439 1.1× 183 0.6× 233 1.0× 131 0.6× 386 2.0× 43 821
C. Fred Miao United States 13 653 1.6× 294 1.0× 194 0.8× 231 1.1× 185 0.9× 15 975
Linda S. Pettijohn United States 14 557 1.3× 150 0.5× 168 0.7× 258 1.3× 121 0.6× 26 826
Thomas H. Stevenson United States 17 268 0.6× 226 0.8× 125 0.5× 248 1.2× 140 0.7× 35 778
Ruth C. King United States 15 382 0.9× 168 0.6× 345 1.5× 193 0.9× 237 1.2× 41 997

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Comer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Comer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Comer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Comer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Comer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Comer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Comer. The network helps show where James M. Comer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Comer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Comer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Comer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Comer. James M. Comer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Comer, James M., et al.. (2013). Methods in Sales Research: A Psychometric Evaluation of the ADAPTS Scale: A Critique and Recommendations. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 10 indexed citations
2.
Comer, James M.. (2013). Sales Management and The Computer: Prospects for the 1980's.. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 1 indexed citations
3.
Comer, James M., Richard E. Plank, David A. Reid, & Ellen Bolman Pullins. (2013). Methods in Sales Research: Perceived Trust in Business-to-Business Sales: A New Measure. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 29 indexed citations
4.
Grewal, Rajdeep, James M. Comer, & Raj Mehta. (2001). An Investigation into the Antecedents of Organizational Participation in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets. Journal of Marketing. 65(3). 17–33. 300 indexed citations
5.
Comer, James M., et al.. (1999). Methods in Sales Research : Perceived Trust in Business-to-Business Sales: A New Measure. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 19(3). 61–71. 2 indexed citations
6.
Russ, Frederick A., et al.. (1998). Exploring the Impact of Critical Sales Events. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 18(2). 19–34. 18 indexed citations
7.
Comer, James M., Dawn R. Deeter‐Schmelz, & Rosemary Ramsey. (1997). Methods in Sales Research: Considering Sources and Types of Social Support: A Psychometric Evaluation of the House and Wells (1978) Instrument. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 17(1). 49–61. 11 indexed citations
8.
Comer, James M., et al.. (1996). Methods in Sales Research : A Psychometric Evaluation of the ADAPTS Scale: A Critique and Recommendations. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 16(4). 53–65. 8 indexed citations
9.
Comer, James M., Rosemary Ramsey, Felicia G. Lassk, & Greg W. Marshall. (1995). Methods in Sales Research : A Critical Evaluation of a Measure of Job Involvement: The Use of the Lodahl and Kejner (1965) Scale with Salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 15(3). 65–74. 14 indexed citations
10.
Comer, James M.. (1994). Methods in Sales Research : Scaling and Measurement Section: A Time for Change. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 14(4). 77–78. 1 indexed citations
11.
Comer, James M., Frank R. Kardes, & Amy K. Sullivan. (1992). Multiple Deescalating Requests, Statistical Information, and Compliance: A Field Experiment1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 22(15). 1199–1207. 5 indexed citations
12.
Bruvold, Norman T., et al.. (1990). Interactive Effects of Major Response Facilitators. Decision Sciences. 21(3). 551–562. 13 indexed citations
13.
Comer, James M.. (1989). Sales Management: People and Profit. 1 indexed citations
14.
Bruvold, Norman T. & James M. Comer. (1988). A model for estimating the response rate to a mailed survey. Journal of Business Research. 16(2). 101–116. 29 indexed citations
15.
Comer, James M.. (1985). Industrial sales managers: Satisfaction and performance. Industrial Marketing Management. 14(4). 239–244. 5 indexed citations
16.
Comer, James M.. (1984). A Psychometric Assessment of a Measure of Sales Representatives' Power Perceptions. Journal of Marketing Research. 21(2). 221–221. 16 indexed citations
17.
Comer, James M., et al.. (1982). PLANNING MAIL SURVEYS: A MANAGERIAL MODEL. Decision Sciences. 13(4). 654–667. 2 indexed citations
18.
Comer, James M. & Alok Chakrabarti. (1978). The information industry for the industrial marketer. Industrial Marketing Management. 7(1). 65–70. 1 indexed citations
19.
Comer, James M.. (1975). The Computer, Personal Selling, and Sales Management. Journal of Marketing. 39(3). 27–27. 7 indexed citations
20.
Comer, James M.. (1974). ALLOCATE: A COMPUTER MODEL FOR SALES TERRITORY PLANNING. Decision Sciences. 5(3). 323–338. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026