James E. Campion

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

James E. Campion is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Campion has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in James E. Campion's work include Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). James E. Campion is often cited by papers focused on Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). James E. Campion collaborates with scholars based in United States and Latvia. James E. Campion's co-authors include Richard D. Arvey, Michael A. Campion, David Palmer, Daniel B. Turban, Philip L. Roth, Mark V. Roehling, Stanley B. Malos, Steven D. Jones, Jack M. Greener and Chet Robie and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Current Directions in Psychological Science and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

James E. Campion

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: A SUMMARY AND REVIEW OF RECENT ... 1982 2026 1996 2011 1982 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. Campion United States 14 570 451 336 322 167 26 1.4k
Steven D. Maurer United States 14 604 1.1× 315 0.7× 231 0.7× 179 0.6× 114 0.7× 26 1.1k
Jeff A. Weekley United States 20 650 1.1× 258 0.6× 325 1.0× 174 0.5× 341 2.0× 27 1.5k
Michelle A. Donovan United States 11 757 1.3× 319 0.7× 513 1.5× 138 0.4× 125 0.7× 16 1.6k
Deborah L. Whetzel United States 14 587 1.0× 331 0.7× 472 1.4× 242 0.8× 490 2.9× 23 1.8k
Anton J. Villado United States 12 610 1.1× 303 0.7× 405 1.2× 360 1.1× 74 0.4× 24 1.4k
Steven F. Cronshaw Canada 15 358 0.6× 216 0.5× 297 0.9× 121 0.4× 70 0.4× 39 908
Andrea F. Snell United States 13 563 1.0× 477 1.1× 495 1.5× 207 0.6× 65 0.4× 25 1.6k
Jill E. Ellingson United States 18 589 1.0× 647 1.4× 493 1.5× 181 0.6× 149 0.9× 27 1.8k
Edward L. Levine United States 20 491 0.9× 243 0.5× 390 1.2× 110 0.3× 45 0.3× 51 1.2k
Evan F. Sinar United States 10 838 1.5× 373 0.8× 300 0.9× 290 0.9× 41 0.2× 18 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Campion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Campion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Campion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Campion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Campion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Campion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Campion. The network helps show where James E. Campion may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Campion

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Campion. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Campion based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Campion. James E. Campion is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Robie, Chet, et al.. (2001). Effects of a Motivational Inducement on the Psychometric Properties of a Cognitive Ability Test. Journal of Business and Psychology. 16(2). 177–189. 1 indexed citations
2.
Campion, Michael A., David Palmer, & James E. Campion. (1998). Structuring Employment Interviews to Improve Reliability, Validity, and Users' Reactions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 7(3). 77–82. 25 indexed citations
3.
Campion, James E., et al.. (1997). Employment interview on trial: Linking interview structure with litigation outcomes.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(6). 900–912. 3 indexed citations
4.
Campion, James E., et al.. (1997). Employment interview on trial: Linking interview structure with litigation outcomes.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(6). 900–912. 58 indexed citations
5.
Roth, Philip L., James E. Campion, & Steven D. Jones. (1996). The impact of four missing data techniques on validity estimates in human resource management. Journal of Business and Psychology. 11(1). 101–112. 16 indexed citations
6.
Campion, James E., et al.. (1995). A survey of clinical trial coordinators: factors influencing job satisfaction and turnover.. PubMed. 30(4). 25–31. 8 indexed citations
7.
Turban, Daniel B., et al.. (1995). Factors Related to Job Acceptance Decisions of College Recruits. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 47(2). 193–213. 62 indexed citations
8.
Campion, Michael A., et al.. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(6). 998–1102. 9 indexed citations
9.
Campion, Michael A., et al.. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(6). 998–1002. 107 indexed citations
10.
Campion, James E., et al.. (1994). Hindsight bias in an application of the Angoff method for setting cutoff scores.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(6). 860–865. 9 indexed citations
11.
Turban, Daniel B., et al.. (1993). Job attributes: Preferences compared with reasons given for accepting and rejecting job offers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 66(1). 71–81. 74 indexed citations
12.
Turban, Daniel B., et al.. (1992). Factors relating to relocation decisions of research and development employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 41(2). 183–199. 43 indexed citations
13.
Roth, Philip L. & James E. Campion. (1992). An analysis of the predictive power of the panel interview and pre‐employment tests. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 65(1). 51–60. 37 indexed citations
14.
Campion, James E. & Richard D. Arvey. (1989). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview.. 20 indexed citations
15.
Campion, Michael A. & James E. Campion. (1987). EVALUATION OF AN INTERVIEWEE SKILLS TRAINING PROGRAM IN A NATURAL FIELD EXPERIMENT. Personnel Psychology. 40(4). 675–691. 41 indexed citations
16.
Campion, James E.. (1987). The Value of Individual Psychological Assessment. Educational Psychology in Practice. 2(4). 27–30. 1 indexed citations
17.
Arvey, Richard D. & James E. Campion. (1982). THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: A SUMMARY AND REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH1. Personnel Psychology. 35(2). 281–322. 435 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Campion, James E., et al.. (1979). Racial bias in the use of work samples for personnel selection.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 64(2). 119–123. 16 indexed citations
19.
Campion, James E.. (1976). The Job Satisfaction of Mexican-American Blue-Collar Employees.. 2 indexed citations
20.
Campion, James E.. (1972). Work sampling for personnel selection.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 56(1). 40–44. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026