J. Timothy McMahon

18 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

J. Timothy McMahon
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 196
  • Information Systems and Management 110
  • Social Psychology 103
  • Strategy and Management 93
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
Replace Michael Keeley with:
Michael Keeley United States
Richard A. Grover United States
Lance B. Kurke United States
Bobby C. Vaught United States
Robert Waldersee Australia
Patricia M. Fandt United States
Marc Siegall United States
Stanley L. Saxton United States
Sidney A. Nachman United States
Walter O. Einstein United States
J. Timothy McMahon relative to Michael Keeley United States Michael Keeley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Michael Keeley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Timothy McMahon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Timothy McMahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Timothy McMahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Timothy McMahon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Timothy McMahon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Timothy McMahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Timothy McMahon. The network helps show where J. Timothy McMahon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Timothy McMahon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Timothy McMahon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Timothy McMahon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Timothy McMahon. J. Timothy McMahon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 31
2
Classics of organizational behavior
32
3 16
4 119
5 9
6 11
7
Individual need satisfaction, organizational practices, and job satisfaction among laboratory professionals.
1
8 23
9 25
10 3
11 13
12 30
13 121
14 10
15 3
16 26
17 2
18 2

About J. Timothy McMahon

J. Timothy McMahon is a scholar working on General Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (196 citations), Information Systems and Management (110 citations) and Management Information Systems (78 citations). J. Timothy McMahon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include John M. Ivancevich, Janelle Brinker Dozier, Bryan W. Husted, Michael W. Kattan, Sara Jansen Perry, Natalia Lorinkova, Emily M. Hunter, John M. Ivancevich, Michael T. Matteson and Andrew D. Szilagyi. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal and Administrative Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026