J. Kemp Ellington
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Erich C. DierdorffRobert S. RubinMark A. WilsonEric A. SurfaceLori Foster ThompsonBrian D. BlumeAdam W. MeadeSamuel T. McAbee
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
J. Kemp Ellington
13 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 174
- Sociology and Political Science 111
- Social Psychology 110
- General Health Professions 45
- Gender Studies 38
Countries citing papers authored by J. Kemp Ellington
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Kemp Ellington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Kemp Ellington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Kemp Ellington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Kemp Ellington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Kemp Ellington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Kemp Ellington. The network helps show where J. Kemp Ellington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Kemp Ellington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Kemp Ellington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Kemp Ellington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Kemp Ellington. J. Kemp Ellington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 128 | |
| 13 | Systematic Sources of Variance in Supervisory Job Performance Ratings: A Multilevel Analysis of Between-Rater and Between-Context Variance | 1 |
| 14 | 2 |
About J. Kemp Ellington
J. Kemp Ellington is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (174 citations), Social Psychology (110 citations) and Applied Psychology (27 citations). J. Kemp Ellington has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Erich C. Dierdorff, Robert S. Rubin, Mark A. Wilson, Eric A. Surface, Lori Foster Thompson, Brian D. Blume, Adam W. Meade, Samuel T. McAbee, Ronald S. Landis and Alan D. Mead. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Personnel Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.