Alan D. Mead

1.6k total citations
15 papers, 809 citations indexed

About

Alan D. Mead is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Alan D. Mead has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 809 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Alan D. Mead's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). Alan D. Mead is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). Alan D. Mead collaborates with scholars based in United States and Austria. Alan D. Mead's co-authors include Fritz Drasgow, Jialin Huang, Bruce A. Williams, Michael V. Levine, Barbara B. Ellis, Alberto Maydeu‐Olivares, Michelle A. Donovan, Julie B. Olson‐Buchanan, Philip J. Moberg and William Oakes and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Personnel Psychology and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Alan D. Mead

15 papers receiving 689 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Alan D. Mead United States	9	205	153	146	129	127	15	809
Phill Gagné United States	10	97 0.5×	113 0.7×	153 1.0×	103 0.8×	115 0.9×	20	775
Tony C. M. Lam Canada	12	119 0.6×	317 2.1×	120 0.8×	55 0.4×	103 0.8×	28	800
Julio Olea Spain	15	273 1.3×	168 1.1×	145 1.0×	141 1.1×	70 0.6×	45	874
Tuulia M. Ortner Austria	15	107 0.5×	42 0.3×	144 1.0×	160 1.2×	116 0.9×	50	599
P. Richard Jeanneret United States	11	108 0.5×	84 0.5×	224 1.5×	87 0.7×	108 0.9×	18	801
H. G. Osburn United States	20	339 1.7×	110 0.7×	202 1.4×	117 0.9×	138 1.1×	44	1.2k
Robert D. Ankenmann United States	12	281 1.4×	68 0.4×	319 2.2×	79 0.6×	117 0.9×	17	741
Siu L. Chow Canada	12	76 0.4×	112 0.7×	203 1.4×	175 1.4×	185 1.5×	40	1.0k
Kristine Y. Hogarty United States	9	74 0.4×	195 1.3×	101 0.7×	65 0.5×	91 0.7×	20	722
Mary L. Tenopyr United States	11	134 0.7×	70 0.5×	172 1.2×	75 0.6×	90 0.7×	29	633

Countries citing papers authored by Alan D. Mead

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan D. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan D. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan D. Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan D. Mead

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan D. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan D. Mead. The network helps show where Alan D. Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan D. Mead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan D. Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan D. Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alan D. Mead. Alan D. Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Zhu, Qin, et al.. (2020). The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decisionmaking in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. 24.1197.1–24.1197.12. 24 indexed citations

Ellington, J. Kemp, Samuel T. McAbee, Ronald S. Landis, & Alan D. Mead. (2019). I Only Have One Rater Per Ratee, So What? The Impact of Clustered Performance Rating Data on Operational Validity Estimates. Journal of Business and Psychology. 36(1). 33–54. 2 indexed citations

Mead, Alan D., et al.. (2015). Inattentive Responding in MTurk and Other Online Samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 8(2). 196–202. 115 indexed citations

Huang, Jialin & Alan D. Mead. (2014). Effect of personality item writing on psychometric properties of ideal-point and likert scales.. Psychological Assessment. 26(4). 1162–1172. 6 indexed citations

Zhu, Qin, et al.. (2014). Examining the role of culture in assessing individual ethical reasoning on multidisciplinary engineering project teams. 1–7. 3 indexed citations

Mead, Alan D. & Scott B. Morris. (2011). About Babies and Bathwater: Retaining Core Principles of the Uniform Guidelines. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 4(4). 554–557. 3 indexed citations

Mead, Alan D.. (2006). An Introduction to Multistage Testing. Applied Measurement in Education. 19(3). 185–187. 15 indexed citations

Mead, Alan D. & David L. Blitz. (2004). Comparability of paper and computerized non-cognitive measures: A review and integration. 3 indexed citations

Mead, Alan D.. (2000). Properties of a Resampling Validation Technique for Empirically Scoring Psychological Assessments. 1 indexed citations

10.

Ellis, Barbara B. & Alan D. Mead. (2000). Assessment of the Measurement Equivalence of a Spanish Translation of the 16PF Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60(5). 787–807. 28 indexed citations

11.

Olson‐Buchanan, Julie B., et al.. (1998). INTERACTIVE VIDEO ASSESSMENT OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION SKILLS. Personnel Psychology. 51(1). 1–24. 58 indexed citations

12.

Drasgow, Fritz, et al.. (1995). Fitting Polytomous Item Response Theory Models to Multiple-Choice Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement. 19(2). 143–166. 180 indexed citations

13.

Maydeu‐Olivares, Alberto, Fritz Drasgow, & Alan D. Mead. (1994). Distinguishing Among Paranletric item Response Models for Polychotomous Ordered Data. Applied Psychological Measurement. 18(3). 245–256. 34 indexed citations

14.

Mead, Alan D. & Fritz Drasgow. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis.. Psychological Bulletin. 114(3). 449–458. 27 indexed citations

15.

Mead, Alan D. & Fritz Drasgow. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis.. Psychological Bulletin. 114(3). 449–458. 310 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact