Alan D. Mead
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Fritz DrasgowJialin HuangBruce A. WilliamsMichael V. LevineBarbara B. EllisAlberto Maydeu‐OlivaresMichelle A. DonovanJulie B. Olson‐Buchanan
- Topics
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchApplied PsychologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Alan D. Mead
15 papers receiving 689 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Management Science and Operations Research 205
- Education 153
- Social Psychology 146
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
- Sociology and Political Science 127
Countries citing papers authored by Alan D. Mead
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan D. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan D. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan D. Mead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan D. Mead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan D. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan D. Mead. The network helps show where Alan D. Mead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan D. Mead
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan D. Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan D. Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alan D. Mead. Alan D. Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 115 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | Comparability of paper and computerized non-cognitive measures: A review and integration | 3 |
| 9 | Properties of a Resampling Validation Technique for Empirically Scoring Psychological Assessments | 1 |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 180 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 310 |
About Alan D. Mead
Alan D. Mead is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Applied Psychology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (205 citations), Applied Psychology (78 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (108 citations). Alan D. Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Fritz Drasgow, Jialin Huang, Bruce A. Williams, Michael V. Levine, Barbara B. Ellis, Alberto Maydeu‐Olivares, Michelle A. Donovan, Julie B. Olson‐Buchanan, Philip J. Moberg and William Oakes. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Personnel Psychology and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.