Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications

445 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1986, received 445 indexed citations. Written by Howard E. Aldrich and Ellen R. Auster covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (226 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (193 citations) and Accounting (164 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9017074 →

Countries where authors are citing Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9017074.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026