Helen C. Reed

12 total papers · 664 total citations
9 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Helen C. Reed is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen C. Reed has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Helen C. Reed's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers). Helen C. Reed is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (4 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers). Helen C. Reed collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and United Kingdom. Helen C. Reed's co-authors include Paul Drijvers, Koeno Gravemeijer, Peter Boon, Michiel Doorman, Paul A. Kirschner, Jelle Jolles, Petra P. M. Hurks, Wim Van der Elst, Claire E. Stevenson and Carolijn Ouwehand and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Learning and Individual Differences and Educational Studies in Mathematics.

In The Last Decade

Helen C. Reed

8 papers receiving 335 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Helen C. Reed 287 115 74 59 57 9 366
Peter Boon 320 1.1× 124 1.1× 88 1.2× 49 0.8× 74 1.3× 18 399
Mark Horney 212 0.7× 168 1.5× 31 0.4× 71 1.2× 37 0.6× 20 385
Nonmanut Pongsakdi 200 0.7× 163 1.4× 104 1.4× 71 1.2× 65 1.1× 11 365
Lisa Ziernwald 239 0.8× 88 0.8× 17 0.2× 123 2.1× 53 0.9× 12 365
Delia Hillmayr 232 0.8× 79 0.7× 17 0.2× 127 2.2× 52 0.9× 7 348
Michelle Riconscente 238 0.8× 161 1.4× 29 0.4× 58 1.0× 36 0.6× 13 386
Dominique Guin 278 1.0× 120 1.0× 87 1.2× 30 0.5× 93 1.6× 7 351
Cecilia Henríquez Fernández 286 1.0× 142 1.2× 56 0.8× 16 0.3× 19 0.3× 7 347
Cengiz Alacacı 335 1.2× 77 0.7× 79 1.1× 23 0.4× 24 0.4× 26 402
Рита Стеблер 277 1.0× 138 1.2× 129 1.7× 40 0.7× 27 0.5× 20 353

Countries citing papers authored by Helen C. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen C. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen C. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen C. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen C. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen C. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen C. Reed. The network helps show where Helen C. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen C. Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen C. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen C. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen C. Reed. Helen C. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026