Greg Leigh

2.3k citations
56 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 20

Greg Leigh

53 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Greg Leigh
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Sensory Systems 390
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 885
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 821
  • Occupational Therapy 92
  • Language and Linguistics 191
Replace Linda Cupples with:
Linda Cupples Australia
Johanna G. Nicholas United States
Sophie E. Ambrose United States
Sarah Worsfold United Kingdom
Vivienne Marnane Australia
Andrea D. Warner‐Czyz United States
Leo De Raeve Belgium
Jean L. DesJardin United States
Thomas Klee United States
Holly K. Craig United States
Greg Leigh relative to Linda Cupples Australia Linda Cupples's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Linda Cupples · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Greg Leigh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Leigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Leigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Leigh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Leigh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Leigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Leigh. The network helps show where Greg Leigh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Greg Leigh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Greg Leigh Line = papers co-authored together Greg Leigh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20232
4 20214
5 20204
6 202030
7 20183
8 201819
9 201714
10 20171
11 201757
12 201635
13 201620
14 201532
15 201369
16 201346
17 2013224
18
Early identification of hearing loss in Australia: well begun is not all done!
20101
19 20102
20 200843

About Greg Leigh

Greg Leigh is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems, Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Occupational Therapy, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (40 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (11 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Language Development and Disorders (8 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (6 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (390 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (885 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (821 citations), Occupational Therapy (92 citations) and Language and Linguistics (191 citations). Greg Leigh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Teresa Y. C. Ching, Linda Cupples, Harvey Dillon, Vivienne Marnane, Mark Seeto, Laura Button, Patricia Van Buynder, Melissa McCarthy, Connie Mayer and Miriam Gunnourie. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Deafness & Education International, International Journal of Audiology, Trends in Hearing and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026