Trends in Hearing

585 papers and 9.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 585 papers published in Trends in Hearing in the last decades have received a total of 9.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Hearing usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (568 papers), Speech and Hearing (358 papers) and Sensory Systems (241 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (556 papers), Noise Effects and Management (358 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (240 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Hearing are Matthew B. Winn, Andrew J. Oxenham, Michael A. Akeroyd, Christopher J. Plack, Garreth Prendergast, Brian C. J. Moore, Thomas Koelewijn, Pamela C. Roehm, Brandon E. Cohen and Sophia E. Kramer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in Hearing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Hearing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Hearing.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Hearing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Hearing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Hearing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Hearing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025