Leo De Raeve

1.7k total citations
51 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Leo De Raeve is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Leo De Raeve has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 15 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Leo De Raeve's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (37 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (21 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers). Leo De Raeve is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (37 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (21 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers). Leo De Raeve collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Australia and Netherlands. Leo De Raeve's co-authors include Jan Wouters, Astrid Van Wieringen, Margreet Langereis, Ingeborg Dhooge, Thomas P. Nikolopoulos, Louis Peeraer, Tinne Boons, Johan H. M. Frijns, Paul Van de Heyning and Christian Desloovere and has published in prestigious journals such as The Laryngoscope, Ear and Hearing and Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology.

In The Last Decade

Leo De Raeve

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Leo De Raeve Belgium 19 875 541 396 320 92 51 1.1k
Mark Seeto Australia 18 1.0k 1.2× 511 0.9× 566 1.4× 343 1.1× 67 0.7× 36 1.3k
Maria Cecília Bevilácqua Brazil 19 967 1.1× 516 1.0× 496 1.3× 380 1.2× 98 1.1× 136 1.3k
Andrea D. Warner‐Czyz United States 17 631 0.7× 463 0.9× 198 0.5× 218 0.7× 71 0.8× 31 806
Karyn L. Galvin Australia 17 893 1.0× 257 0.5× 488 1.2× 463 1.4× 91 1.0× 64 1.0k
Rachael Frush Holt United States 19 788 0.9× 560 1.0× 248 0.6× 172 0.5× 259 2.8× 46 1.1k
Sophie E. Ambrose United States 16 897 1.0× 1.0k 1.9× 376 0.9× 134 0.4× 75 0.8× 25 1.4k
Shirley C. Henning United States 17 794 0.9× 743 1.4× 201 0.5× 158 0.5× 137 1.5× 27 1.1k
K. Jonas Brännström Sweden 20 827 0.9× 246 0.5× 343 0.9× 500 1.6× 140 1.5× 85 1.1k
Jaime Leigh Australia 12 951 1.1× 455 0.8× 569 1.4× 302 0.9× 49 0.5× 20 1.1k
Meredith Spratford United States 17 981 1.1× 556 1.0× 525 1.3× 260 0.8× 36 0.4× 34 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Leo De Raeve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo De Raeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo De Raeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo De Raeve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo De Raeve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo De Raeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo De Raeve. The network helps show where Leo De Raeve may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leo De Raeve

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leo De Raeve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leo De Raeve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leo De Raeve. Leo De Raeve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Raeve, Leo De, et al.. (2023). Quality Standard for Rehabilitation of Young Deaf Children Receiving Cochlear Implants. Medicina. 59(7). 1354–1354. 2 indexed citations
2.
Raeve, Leo De, et al.. (2021). Visual prosody supports reading aloud expressively for deaf readers. Visible Language. 55(1).
3.
Raeve, Leo De, et al.. (2018). Translation and validation of the Listen Inventory for Education Revised into Dutch. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 107. 62–68. 6 indexed citations
4.
Raeve, Leo De. (2016). Cochlear implants in Belgium: Prevalence in paediatric and adult cochlear implantation. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases. 133. S57–S60. 21 indexed citations
5.
Raeve, Leo De, Anneke Vermeulen, & A.F.M. Snik. (2015). Verbal Cognition in Deaf Children Using Cochlear Implants: Effect of Unilateral and Bilateral Stimulation. Audiology and Neurotology. 20(4). 261–266. 31 indexed citations
6.
Wiefferink, Carin H., Carolien Rieffe, Lizet Ketelaar, Leo De Raeve, & Johan H. M. Frijns. (2012). Emotion Understanding in Deaf Children with a Cochlear Implant. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 18(2). 175–186. 90 indexed citations
7.
Raeve, Leo De, et al.. (2012). Changing Schools for the Deaf: Updating the Educational Setting for Our Deaf Children in the 21st Century, a Big Challenge. Deafness & Education International. 14(1). 48–59. 12 indexed citations
9.
Boons, Tinne, Astrid Van Wieringen, Leo De Raeve, Louis Peeraer, & Jan Wouters. (2011). Evaluatie van de taalvaardigheid van ernstig slechthorende en dove kinderen met de CELF-4-NL. 17(2). 52–72. 1 indexed citations
10.
Raeve, Leo De. (2010). Changing Candidature: Do We Know How to Support These Children and Their Families in Short and Long Term?. Cochlear Implants International. 11(sup1). 228–230. 2 indexed citations
11.
Nogueira, Waldo, et al.. (2010). Speech Recognition Technology in CI Rehabilitation. Cochlear Implants International. 11(sup1). 449–453. 3 indexed citations
13.
Vermeulen, Anneke, et al.. (2010). Reading Comprehension of Flemish Deaf Children in Belgium: Sources of Variability in Reading Comprehension after Cochlear Implantation. Deafness & Education International. 12(2). 77–98. 13 indexed citations
14.
Philips, Birgit, Paul Corthals, Leo De Raeve, et al.. (2009). Impact of newborn hearing screening. The Laryngoscope. 119(5). 974–979. 32 indexed citations
15.
Deun, Lieselot Van, Astrid Van Wieringen, Tom Francart, et al.. (2009). Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Binaural Unmasking. Audiology and Neurotology. 14(4). 240–247. 34 indexed citations
16.
Scherf, Fanny, Lieselot Van Deun, Astrid Van Wieringen, et al.. (2009). Subjective Benefits of Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Young Children after 18 Months of Implant Use. ORL. 71(2). 112–121. 28 indexed citations
17.
Scherf, Fanny, Lieselot Van Deun, Astrid Van Wieringen, et al.. (2009). Three-Year Postimplantation Auditory Outcomes in Children with Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 118(5). 336–344. 35 indexed citations
18.
Raeve, Leo De, et al.. (2007). Deaf children with cochlear implants before the age of 1 year: Comparison of preverbal communication with normally hearing children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 71(10). 1605–1611. 82 indexed citations
19.
Scherf, Fanny, Lieselot Van Deun, Astrid Van Wieringen, et al.. (2007). Hearing benefits of second-side cochlear implantation in two groups of children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 71(12). 1855–1863. 50 indexed citations
20.
Deun, Lieselot Van, Astrid Van Wieringen, Fanny Scherf, et al.. (2006). Sound localization and lateralization in normal-hearing and bilaterally implanted children. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026