William Noble

7.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
106 papers, 5.3k citations indexed

About

William Noble is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, William Noble has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 5.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 45 papers in Speech and Hearing and 34 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in William Noble's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (59 papers), Noise Effects and Management (45 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (34 papers). William Noble is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (59 papers), Noise Effects and Management (45 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (34 papers). William Noble collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. William Noble's co-authors include Stuart Gatehouse, Richard S. Tyler, Iain Davidson, Denis Byrne, Navjot Bhullar, Camille C. Dunn, Shelley Witt, Michael A. Akeroyd, Claudia Coelho and Graham Naylor and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

In The Last Decade

William Noble

102 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Noble Australia 40 4.2k 2.5k 2.5k 880 688 106 5.3k
Judy R. Dubno United States 50 6.6k 1.6× 3.5k 1.4× 3.4k 1.4× 518 0.6× 1.1k 1.7× 238 7.8k
Mario A. Svirsky United States 37 3.7k 0.9× 969 0.4× 1.5k 0.6× 1.6k 1.8× 1.1k 1.6× 133 4.7k
Quentin Summerfield United Kingdom 33 3.1k 0.7× 869 0.3× 674 0.3× 394 0.4× 1.4k 2.0× 75 4.4k
Kevin J. Munro United Kingdom 41 4.6k 1.1× 2.7k 1.1× 3.3k 1.3× 403 0.5× 438 0.6× 212 5.9k
Blake S. Wilson United States 29 3.6k 0.9× 1.4k 0.6× 2.0k 0.8× 392 0.4× 1.0k 1.5× 70 4.3k
Kelly L. Tremblay United States 39 5.1k 1.2× 1.6k 0.6× 1.7k 0.7× 488 0.6× 471 0.7× 77 5.5k
Stuart Rosen United Kingdom 46 5.9k 1.4× 1.5k 0.6× 1.3k 0.5× 2.2k 2.5× 1.6k 2.3× 166 7.3k
Nancy Tye‐Murray United States 29 2.5k 0.6× 569 0.2× 879 0.4× 1.2k 1.3× 353 0.5× 110 3.2k
Stig Arlinger Sweden 33 3.2k 0.8× 1.9k 0.8× 1.5k 0.6× 559 0.6× 582 0.8× 126 4.0k
Richard T. Miyamoto United States 39 3.7k 0.9× 701 0.3× 1.7k 0.7× 2.2k 2.5× 472 0.7× 126 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by William Noble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Noble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Noble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Noble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Noble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Noble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Noble. The network helps show where William Noble may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Noble

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Noble. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Noble based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Noble. William Noble is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Galvin, Karyn L. & William Noble. (2013). Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers. Cochlear Implants International. 14(3). 135–141. 61 indexed citations
2.
Dunn, Camille C., et al.. (2010). Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users Compared on Speech Perception in Noise. Ear and Hearing. 31(2). 296–298. 80 indexed citations
3.
Noble, William, Richard S. Tyler, Camille C. Dunn, & Navjot Bhullar. (2008). Hearing Handicap Ratings Among Different Profiles of Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Ear and Hearing. 29(1). 112–120. 51 indexed citations
4.
Burnham, Denis, Greg Leigh, William Noble, et al.. (2008). Parameters in Television Captioning for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Adults: Effects of Caption Rate Versus Text Reduction on Comprehension. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 13(3). 391–404. 43 indexed citations
5.
Tyler, Richard S., et al.. (2007). Clinical trials for tinnitus: study populations, designs, measurement variables, and data analysis. Progress in brain research. 166. 499–509. 73 indexed citations
6.
Tyler, Richard S., Camille C. Dunn, Shelley Witt, & William Noble. (2007). Speech Perception and Localization With Adults With Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing. 28(2). 86S–90S. 67 indexed citations
7.
Noble, William & Richard S. Tyler. (2007). Physiology and phenomenology of tinnitus: Implications for treatment. International Journal of Audiology. 46(10). 569–574. 19 indexed citations
8.
Tyler, Richard S., William Noble, Camille C. Dunn, & Shelley Witt. (2006). Some benefits and limitations of binaural cochlear implants and our ability to measure them. International Journal of Audiology. 45(sup1). 113–119. 43 indexed citations
11.
Cox, Robyn M., M. L. Hyde, Stuart Gatehouse, et al.. (2000). Optimal Outcome Measures, Research Priorities, and International Cooperation. Ear and Hearing. 21(Supplement). 106S–115S. 192 indexed citations
12.
Noble, William. (2000). Self-Reports about Tinnitus and about Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing. 21(Supplement). 50S–59S. 13 indexed citations
13.
Noble, William, et al.. (1997). The contribution of head motion cues to localization of low-pass noise. Perception & Psychophysics. 59(7). 1018–1026. 104 indexed citations
14.
Noble, William, et al.. (1996). Effects of Earmold Type on Ability to Locate Sounds When Wearing Hearing Aids. Ear and Hearing. 17(3). 218–228. 18 indexed citations
15.
Noble, William. (1991). Evaluation of disability and handicap in noise-induced hearing loss. Canadian acoustics. 19(2). 23–26. 3 indexed citations
16.
Noble, William, et al.. (1991). Auditory localization under conditions of unilateral fitting of different hearing aid systems. British Journal of Audiology. 25(4). 237–250. 19 indexed citations
17.
Noble, William, et al.. (1990). A comparison of different binaural hearing aid systems for sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes. British Journal of Audiology. 24(5). 335–346. 54 indexed citations
18.
Noble, William. (1988). Evaluation of Hearing Handicap: A Critique of Ward's Position. International Journal of Audiology. 27(1). 53–61. 3 indexed citations
19.
Atherley, G. R. C. & William Noble. (1985). Occupational deafness: The continuing challenge of early German and Scottish research. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 8(2). 101–117. 7 indexed citations
20.
Noble, William. (1978). Assessment of impaired hearing : a critique and a new method. RUNE (Research UNE). 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026