Julia Day
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 7
-
- Hearing Impairment and Communication 7
- Reading and Literacy Development 2
- Second Language Acquisition and Learning 1
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 9
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Noise Effects and Management 1
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 1
-
- Speech and Audio Processing 1
- Co-authors
- Teresa Y. C. ChingKathryn CroweR. C. GardnerMark SeetoLinda CupplesHarvey DillonLaura StreetVicky Zhang
- Journals
- Cochlear Implants International (4 papers)International Journal of Audiology (3 papers)British Journal of Educational Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Julia Day
12 papers receiving 619 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Sensory Systems 241
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 372
- Cognitive Neuroscience 446
- Speech and Hearing 86
- Language and Linguistics 123
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Day. The network helps show where Julia Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Julia Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 224 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 61 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 83 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 130 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 6 |
About Julia Day
Julia Day is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Speech and Audio Processing (1 paper) and Noise Effects and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (241 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (372 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (446 citations), Speech and Hearing (86 citations) and Language and Linguistics (123 citations). Julia Day has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Teresa Y. C. Ching, Kathryn Crowe, R. C. Gardner, Mark Seeto, Linda Cupples, Harvey Dillon, Laura Street, Vicky Zhang, Sanna Hou and Christopher Flynn. Their work appears in journals such as Cochlear Implants International, International Journal of Audiology, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Ear and Hearing and Reading Research Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.