Geoffrey Grimm
- Education top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Elaine WangEmma LeeJohn EngbergLea XenakisSangeeta C. AhluwaliaCatherine H. AugustineEric ApaydinRajeev Ramchand
- Topics
- Education Discipline and Inequality (2 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey Grimm
12 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Education 112
- General Health Professions 53
- Social Psychology 50
- Clinical Psychology 48
- Sociology and Political Science 43
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Grimm
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Grimm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Grimm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Grimm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Grimm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Grimm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Grimm. The network helps show where Geoffrey Grimm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Grimm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Grimm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Grimm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Grimm. Geoffrey Grimm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Can Restorative Practices Improve School Climate and Curb Suspensions? An Evaluation of the Impact of Restorative Practices in a Mid-Sized Urban School District. Research Report. RR-2840-DOJ. | 5 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 103 | |
| 11 | 93 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | [Secondary prevention following coronary intervention. Survey of 13 intervention centers in Austria]. | 2 |
About Geoffrey Grimm
Geoffrey Grimm is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Discipline and Inequality (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (112 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (36 citations) and Social Psychology (50 citations). Geoffrey Grimm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Elaine Wang, Emma Lee, John Engberg, Lea Xenakis, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, Catherine H. Augustine, Eric Apaydin, Rajeev Ramchand, Laura Raaen and Rosanna Smart. Their work appears in journals such as Preventive Medicine, SAGE Open and Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.