Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transformative epistemologies for regenerative tourism: towards a decolonial paradigm in science and practice?
202343 citationsLoretta Bellato, Niki Frantzeskaki et al.Journal of Sustainable Tourismprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Lee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Lee. The network helps show where Emma Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Lee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Lee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Lee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Lee. Emma Lee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bellato, Loretta, et al.. (2023). Transformative epistemologies for regenerative tourism: towards a decolonial paradigm in science and practice?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 32(6). 1161–1181.43 indexed citations breakdown →
Augustine, Catherine H., et al.. (2018). Can Restorative Practices Improve School Climate and Curb Suspensions? An Evaluation of the Impact of Restorative Practices in a Mid-Sized Urban School District. Research Report. RR-2840-DOJ..5 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Emma & Benjamin J. Richardson. (2017). From museum to living cultural landscape : governing Tasmania’s wilderness world heritage. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
13.
Lee, Emma, et al.. (2016). The Fate of Indigenous Place-Based Heritage in the Era of Native Title. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
14.
Lee, Emma, et al.. (2016). From boardroom to kitchen table: shifting the power seat of Indigenous governance in protected area management. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).6 indexed citations
15.
Lee, Emma. (2016). Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Protection in Tasmania: The Failure of Rights; the Restorative Potential of Historical Resilience. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).4 indexed citations
16.
Lee, Emma, et al.. (2015). Over Land, Over Sea: poems for those seeking refuge. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University).3 indexed citations
Lee, Emma. (2002). The Tale of a Whale: Significant Aboriginal Landscapes of the Northern Beaches. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
19.
Lee, Emma. (2000). Histories of Homebush Bay and the Sydney Aboriginal Fight for Recognition. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
20.
Lee, Emma. (1998). Aboriginal history of Homebush Bay Olympic site. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.