Fátima Fonseca
- Molecular Medicine top 2%
- Food Science top 5%
- Pollution top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- António CorreiaMaría José SaavedraIsabel HenriquesArtur AlvesFrederico Ferreira‐da‐SilvaNuno MateusVíctor de FreitasJames Spencer
- Topics
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers)Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Molecular BiologyJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Fátima Fonseca
19 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Molecular Medicine 269
- Food Science 190
- Pollution 168
- Molecular Biology 167
- Plant Science 120
Countries citing papers authored by Fátima Fonseca
This map shows the geographic impact of Fátima Fonseca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fátima Fonseca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fátima Fonseca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fátima Fonseca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fátima Fonseca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fátima Fonseca. The network helps show where Fátima Fonseca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fátima Fonseca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fátima Fonseca. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fátima Fonseca based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fátima Fonseca. Fátima Fonseca is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 109 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | Isolation and Characterization of Retrotransposons in Wild and Cultivated Peanut Species | 1 |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 166 | |
| 19 | 25 |
About Fátima Fonseca
Fátima Fonseca is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Biochemistry and Endocrinology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (269 citations), Endocrinology (94 citations) and Biochemistry (106 citations). Fátima Fonseca has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include António Correia, María José Saavedra, Isabel Henriques, Artur Alves, Frederico Ferreira‐da‐Silva, Nuno Mateus, Víctor de Freitas, James Spencer, Ana Fernandes and Joana Oliveira. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Molecular Biology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.